seeing as how we are not in France nor is the board written in French....L'Acadamie really has no bearing on the discussion.
Discussion of how different varieties of English spell this -borrowed- word, sure....but how it differs from the actual French word...not germane to any discussion...
I agree with this......and I don't think most are thinking past the 'ugg that sucks'...
But even the insightful thought process of why some of it is bad (if that sort of discussion was occuring), while occaisionally thought provoking, if it surplants talking about actual vintage, why we like...
I think one of the things that is a main issue,is that taken as a WHOLE, all those "I hate..', 'What I dont have...','people these days are lacking...' threads is that they foster the environment of 'not good enough'....amongst the larger group.
Go in and read one, and surely you will find...
When I lived in the Amazon, and did my clothes washing in the river, I used a washboard and bar-soap (mmm Fels Naptha!) to do all my laundry...and lets just say doing sheets that way...sucks.
The 'Easy' would have seemed like a modern marvel!
ahhh but therein lies the rub.
In general, we do not depend on the meaning of the root words to determine the current word's meaning.
Take for example edify. If we want to use the root word's historical meaning, then you can't edify a person, only a building or structure. (
So while...
My explanation last night was simplified.
Perhaps if I go into the whole sordid tale this will make more sense. I shall try anyhow...to explain why one can add the co- to conspirator and have it be correct grammatically.
In English, prefix construction can happen in two ways.
The...
Small technicality here....but the word conspirators does not contain the prefix co-. It contains the prefix con- .
They are related and indeed carry similar meanings, but are still different prefixes.
I am being fussy I know...but if the prefix in conspire was co- that would make the...
exactly! the normal plural of conspirators does not imply that conspirators were involved in the SAME conspiracy. co-conspirators does imply one conspiracy with multiple parties conspiring together.
Exactly..and someone from Spain would not pick hispanic either, but european.... and in the US census, it literally says 'is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish Origin?'
http://www.prb.org/Articles/2009/questionnaire.aspx
is where it shows exactly the choices.....I highly doubt that...
The census I was speaking of is the US census....
Martin, se você lea mais uma vez o que eu diz lá em cima, no diz que os brasileiros -são- 'hispanic' ou 'latinos'. Ao contrário! A problema é uma relacionada aos categorias nos EUA.
Posso perguntar você, se tem que escolher entre apenas...
Brazilians see themselves as a very European ethnicity. So on a census they would not check Latino or Hispanic (and these two are OFTEN clumped together, the 2010 Census gives you the choice of "Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin nor 'not "Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin' ), rather Europoean...
Heh...well your posting the tutorial here just affirms that the lack of a subforum has not stopped anyone from posting such things
;)
past examples include...a tutorial about starching clothing was done, and rightly belongs in 'general attire'....furniture stuff in either 'golden era' or...
A lovely new set of US stamps was announced over the holidays and will be out in June.
The full scoop is here: http://www.usps.com/communications/newsroom/2010/pr10_125.htm
But man...these look super cool and are 'forever' stamps, so one can stock up and never be without.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.