Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Questions About the United States Navy Peacoat

Slobo

New in Town
Messages
31
Location
Virginia
Peacoat,
I'm pretty sure it was a 1938. Wish I knew where I saw it. Was one of those sites that you just come across when going through Google, etc. I think I'll enter 1938 US Navy peacoat and see what happens. To tell you the truth I'm not too crazy about the WWI coats. My favorite are the post WWII, and then the WWII coats. Supposed to go into the 90s today and tomorrow as it has for a good part of the summer. Maybe I'll take a cruise (or walk) in one of my coats (LOL).

At this link, you'll find the USCG uniform regs from 1930 as amended through mid 1941. On p. 94 of the .pdf, you will note an amendment dated 11/21/1938 replacing the prior specs for the peacoat (as recognized by the USCG) and substituting the specs as we know WW2-era peacoats to be.

https://www.uscg.mil/history/docs/uniforms/USCG1930UniformRegs.pdf

I am assuming the language replaced was the WW1-era peacoat specs. Since the USCG followed the USN uniform regs rather closely, with the exception of cap devices and gold buttons and corps distinctions, presumably the USN adopted these specs sometime around 1938 or before. Still a mystery to me is whether the 11/21/1938 amendment was playing catch up after a more prolonged period of USN specs being in place, or whether they came close in time to each other.
 

Peacoat

*
Bartender
Messages
6,296
Location
South of Nashville
At this link, you'll find the USCG uniform regs from 1930 as amended through mid 1941. On p. 94 of the .pdf, you will note an amendment dated 11/21/1938 replacing the prior specs for the peacoat (as recognized by the USCG) and substituting the specs as we know WW2-era peacoats to be.

https://www.uscg.mil/history/docs/uniforms/USCG1930UniformRegs.pdf

I am assuming the language replaced was the WW1-era peacoat specs. Since the USCG followed the USN uniform regs rather closely, with the exception of cap devices and gold buttons and corps distinctions, presumably the USN adopted these specs sometime around 1938 or before. Still a mystery to me is whether the 11/21/1938 amendment was playing catch up after a more prolonged period of USN specs being in place, or whether they came close in time to each other.
Unfortunately for me the link only has VIII Chapters going to page 63. I see no way to get to page 94. I have opened the link twice with the same results each time.

I would think the regulations came close in time together and perhaps simultaneously. The two services do communicate and probably collaborated in developing new uniforms as they were basically the same back then, and probably still are.

This appears to me to be a major find which is corroborated by the comments of Spoonbelly above.
 

Peacoat

*
Bartender
Messages
6,296
Location
South of Nashville
Thanks for the suggestion; Firefox opened the entire document.

Wow, this is a major discovery. Looks like the WWI era changed over to the WWII era on November 21, 1938. Although this is a Coast Guard document, I think the link between the two services is sufficient to suggest the Navy also changed over on or about this date.

Slobo, you have earned your keep with this find.
 

Spoonbelly

One of the Regulars
Messages
226
Location
Dutchess Co. New York
At this link, you'll find the USCG uniform regs from 1930 as amended through mid 1941. On p. 94 of the .pdf, you will note an amendment dated 11/21/1938 replacing the prior specs for the peacoat (as recognized by the USCG) and substituting the specs as we know WW2-era peacoats to be.

https://www.uscg.mil/history/docs/uniforms/USCG1930UniformRegs.pdf

I am assuming the language replaced was the WW1-era peacoat specs. Since the USCG followed the USN uniform regs rather closely, with the exception of cap devices and gold buttons and corps distinctions, presumably the USN adopted these specs sometime around 1938 or before. Still a mystery to me is whether the 11/21/1938 amendment was playing catch up after a more prolonged period of USN specs being in place, or whether they came close in time to each other.
Thanks for the suggestion; Firefox opened the entire document.

Wow, this is a major discovery. Looks like the WWI era changed over to the WWII era on November 21, 1938. Although this is a Coast Guard document, I think the link between the two services is sufficient to suggest the Navy also changed over on or about this date.

Slobo, you have earned your keep with this find.

Just thought I'd throw this out. Speaking of USCG coats. I bought a WWII USCG coat from ebay. Don't know what year it was but it wound up being a size 44 instead of my size 46. I decided to sell it back on ebay. The material on that coat was INCREDIBLE. Superior and more beautiful then the other USN WWII coat that I have. It bummed me out that it didn't fit.
 

Slobo

New in Town
Messages
31
Location
Virginia
Unfortunately for me the link only has VIII Chapters going to page 63. I see no way to get to page 94. I have opened the link twice with the same results each time.

I would think the regulations came close in time together and perhaps simultaneously. The two services do communicate and probably collaborated in developing new uniforms as they were basically the same back then, and probably still are.

This appears to me to be a major find which is corroborated by the comments of Spoonbelly above.

If the first link is not getting you the whole document. Try the link(s) off the Coast Guard's website here:
https://www.uscg.mil/history/uscghist/USCG_Uniform_Index.asp

When I found these the other day, I felt like I had found the key to the kingdom. Thank you Coast Guard -- Semper Paratus.
 
Last edited:

Peacoat

*
Bartender
Messages
6,296
Location
South of Nashville
Yes, this is excellent. Now put your browser to work and see if you can dig up the corresponding U. S. Navy documents so we can probe my theory that both services adopted the WWII style at about the same time. And I'll bet that the Merchant Marine did the same thing.
 

Slobo

New in Town
Messages
31
Location
Virginia
Yes, this is excellent. Now put your browser to work and see if you can dig up the corresponding U. S. Navy documents so we can probe my theory that both services adopted the WWII style at about the same time. And I'll bet that the Merchant Marine did the same thing.
Done, and no dice.
 

artemv

New in Town
Messages
4
What you can say about this one? Can buy that coat for 50$, wors it?
p7190037-jpg.7468024
p7190041-jpg.7468027
p7190042-jpg.7468035
 

artemv

New in Town
Messages
4
So much has been said about US coats. In before i would like to hear some information about the German ones.
 

Doctor Damage

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,263
Location
Ontario

Spartcom5

New in Town
Messages
32
I'm still interested in acquiring another peacoat for my collection. Were there any different colors or styles of the peacoat from 1940s? I have the WW2 navy one already... any ideas? I'd love a 1930s coat or older. I love peacoats because they are timeless pieces and still look great even in 2016, great pieces to have.
 

xmr

One of the Regulars
Messages
227
Location
Germany
I have to thank Peacoat for his info. I just got a ca. 1968 Peacoat made by Pembroke, size 38L. I have a 39,5-40" chest and it fits perfect with just a shirt under it. Sleeve length is perfect as well.

 

Peacoat

*
Bartender
Messages
6,296
Location
South of Nashville
I'm still interested in acquiring another peacoat for my collection. Were there any different colors or styles of the peacoat from 1940s? I have the WW2 navy one already... any ideas? I'd love a 1930s coat or older. I love peacoats because they are timeless pieces and still look great even in 2016, great pieces to have.
Peacoats remained the same from about 1938 until the end of WW II. Coats prior to 1938 are extremely rare. So rare that I have never seen one.

My dissertation on peacoats is in a sticky at the top of the Outerwear first page in the top post by Dinerman.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
107,025
Messages
3,026,642
Members
52,533
Latest member
RacerJ
Top