Terms Which Have Disappeared

Stanley Doble said:

Does anyone remember dining out on a story? This was a common theme in English novels of long ago. If someone had an interesting anecdote or personal experience to tell, it might be said of him "he dined out on that story for years".

I took it that meant when a hostess was putting together a dinner party she would try to include someone who could entertain her guests.

This was an upper class thing or so I gathered. Never heard the phrase anywhere else but posh English novels. For some reason I got thinking about them today.

Click to expand...

Stanley Doble said:

Does anyone remember dining out on a story? This was a common theme in English novels of long ago. If someone had an interesting anecdote or personal experience to tell, it might be said of him "he dined out on that story for years".

I took it that meant when a hostess was putting together a dinner party she would try to include someone who could entertain her guests.

This was an upper class thing or so I gathered. Never heard the phrase anywhere else but posh English novels. For some reason I got thinking about them today.

Click to expand...

LizzieMaine said:

Yep, it's a creation of formal dinner parties, where a rigid protocol of seating was forced -- man/woman/man/woman/man/woman, with all married couples separated to ensure that all participants were required to converse with persons to whom they were not married. Colorful stories helped to fill That Awkward Moment when the guest realized that he or she otherwise had nothing much to say to the persons seated on either side.

Show business personalities dreaded being invited to such soirees, because they knew that when the conversation inevitably began to sag, they would be "invited" to step to the piano and put on an impromptu performance for which they would not be paid, except perhaps with the privilege of associating with such an august group.

Click to expand...

Fading Fast said:

In addition to novels, you can see some of this behavior in pre-code / early '30s movies. One of the key plot lines of "Dinner at Eight" is the host's need to both get the right male-female balance for her dinner party and her desire to have a "star" guest - in this case European royalty of some sort if memory serves. I enjoy the insane "rules" and formality of these dinners - right down to the crazy "who's going to walk whom in" event. It's all nuts, but fun to watch.

Click to expand...

... and most folks today don't seem to have ever even seen a lead pipe.

Click to expand...

Upgrade said:

Wasn’t that problem that most places still have lead pipes because of cost, but Flint did not sustain the anti-corrosion treatment that maintains the protective barrier lining the pipes?

Click to expand...

3fingers said:

Correct. There have never been lead water mains (at least in modern times). One theory of the fall of the Roman empire was dementia caused by lead poisoning from their water system. The lead pipe is the small service line for the home (usually 3/4" diameter) connected to the large water main in the street. Corrosive water etches the lead service line or lead solder used for copper piping inside the home. Flint quit paying Detroit for their water, so Detroit shut them off. Flint tried to restart their own long idled water plant and incompetence and buffoonery ensued.

Click to expand...

vitanola said:

Yes, but there was more involved. A prominent, politicallt activeve West Michigan family was hoping to work with an international conglomerate to acquire the Detroit water system. The loss of booked revenue from Flint further destabilized the finances of the Detroit Water Authority. An unexpected wrench was thrown into this plan when the Michigan voters overwhelmingly voted against the "Emergency Manager" law. With a little effort a new emergency manager law was passed, this one attached to a minor approprations bill, for appropriations bills are not subject to referendum. All went well until the emergency managers in Flint (with more than a little encouragement from Flint's singularly inept elected officials) bollixed the whole game.

Click to expand...

Fading Fast said:

But this:

An unexpected wrench was thrown into this plan when the Michigan voters overwhelmingly voted against the "Emergency Manager" law. With a little effort a new emergency manager law was passed, this one attached to a minor approprations bill, for appropriations bills are not subject to referendum.
​

is, IMHO, a good part of the reason people (from both sides of the political divide) are so angry at politicians in general. The people voted "no" and the politicians used legislative gaming to get around the will of people.

Again, maybe the EML was/is necessary, but the job of the politician is to sell that to the people - to convince them of its necessity - not fail at selling it and, then, jam it through anyway.

Click to expand...

Fading Fast said:

I am not commenting (and don't know / don't have an opinion) on whether or not this Emergency Manager law is good or bad - I have no idea at all.

But this:

An unexpected wrench was thrown into this plan when the Michigan voters overwhelmingly voted against the "Emergency Manager" law. With a little effort a new emergency manager law was passed, this one attached to a minor approprations bill, for appropriations bills are not subject to referendum.
​

is, IMHO, a good part of the reason people (from both sides of the political divide) are so angry at politicians in general. The people voted "no" and the politicians used legislative gaming to get around the will of people.

Again, maybe the EML was/is necessary, but the job of the politician is to sell that to the people - to convince them of its necessity - not fail at selling it and, then, jam it through anyway.

Click to expand...

Zombie_61 said:

Of course they do; they just don't call it that any more.

Click to expand...

Fading Fast said:

One that is fading - still hear it, but rarely: "stock-in-trade."

Click to expand...