I've looked around the forum and this thread but couldn't find a definitive answer so I'll ask it here.
Where is the best place to buy a new Borsalino Alessandria if you live in the US?
Thanks for your help.
I've looked around the forum and this thread but couldn't find a definitive answer so I'll ask it here.
Where is the best place to buy a new Borsalino Alessandria if you live in the US?
Thanks for your help.
As far as I know, rabbit/ hare felt doesn't felt as densely with the modern felting techniques as it did with the old techniques involving mercury. Beaver felt generally felts more densely, or perhaps I should say the possibilty is there even with the modern techniques.
The pouncing on the modern Borso's felt is actuall quite good, but the felting itself is a limiting factor in what can be done with it when doing the finish.
We either make ourselves miserable or we make ourselves strong. The amount of work is the same.
Cheers! Nik
In the Classifieds: Late40s/early50s Stetson OR-style 25 | Rabbit's May Sale
[QUOTE=Rabbit;1419672]Modern production Borsalino versus vintage and modern custom hats:
Rabbit, thanks for the great comparison. Very interresting to see the difference between the felts!
Regards
Manfred
Quite interesting! Now I am really looking forward to receiving my first VS to compare it to my Borsa. After all, itīs the name of all things that makes a Borsalino a must have for me. I always wanted to own this legend.
Frank
Last edited by mayserwegener; 03-13-2012 at 12:01 PM.
Its always been my understanding that Mercury was NOT the reason that vintage felt was so wonderful. Mercury was used for combing out the pelts in order to sheer the fur off the pelts. It had nothing to do with the finishing process. Besides, the use of Mercury was essentially stopped in the 30's. I forgot the exact date that most hatters stopped using it, but it was it was fairly early. The Borso's from the mid 30's, 40's, 50's, etc didn't use Mercury and they were outstanding hats. I know this issue has been discussed over and over again on the lounge. The MAJOR two differences that are different today is the use of synthetic shellac verses natural shellac, and the density of the felt due to changes in the process (Whatever that may be).
BTW: Most of those early 1900's Stetsons that we all love were not beaver, they were rabbit and wild hare. They used Nutria also, but it seems to be that very few hats from the "golden era" of hats were actually 100% beaver.
"For all we know this may only be a dream. We come and go like a ripple on a stream. So love me tonight; tomorrow was made for some. Tomorrow may never come, for all we know." (Nat King Cole)
Thanks for clarifying that, Josh.
I've read about these points, too. It's really a long discussion, this whole topic - we're basically trying to put together the bits and pieces.
I believe the use of mercury was completely banned in the earliest 1940s, and was already used less and less in the 1930s.
Thanks for pointing out the importance of the shellac factor!
+1 to your remark about the 100% beaver hats. They could do wonders with rabbit felt and blended felts back in the day...
Edit:
At least until the early 50s, not only Borsalino but also American hat companies (Resistol with its extremely dense Kitten Finish, for instance) were still producing outstanding felts, which sort of speaks in favor of your point about the mercury not being the critical factor.
Last edited by Rabbit; 03-13-2012 at 12:38 PM.
We either make ourselves miserable or we make ourselves strong. The amount of work is the same.
Cheers! Nik
In the Classifieds: Late40s/early50s Stetson OR-style 25 | Rabbit's May Sale