I got my Spring JC Penny catalog yesterday. They now have a trouser that comes in three fits, above waist, at waist, and below waist, currently on sale for $24.99. Better still, it comes in all sizes from petites and women's petite (yeah!) to tall and ultra-tall. The only drawback is that the hem loks somewhat narrow, so they wouldn't work for a vintage look.
http://www4.jcpenney.com/jcp/Product...mResetCat=true
kamikat
Thank God!
I went shopping for modern dress pants after Christmas, and was very happy to find them without pleats in the front too.
Deb
http://www.BabylonMall.com
Vintage Clothing
...you'll love these:
(or you might not)
You know, if they had a side zipper or somthing, I think I would like them!!
Nikki
They are a tad bit high in the waist. I don't want them all the way up to my bust
Yes, they're just this side of a bustier.
Someone who is taller or more long-waisted than I am might go for them.
they would probably only look good on a size 2 like you. By the time you get to the double digits sizes, they'd look like bib overall.
I have this pattern.
LD
lets be nice...
Ok that's awesome. Let's put some suspenders on that gal up top and she'll be period correct!Originally Posted by Lady Day
I have this pattern.
LD
lets be nice...
The meek will inherit the earth, but not the mineral rights. -J. Paul Getty
Lady Day, I have never seen a pair of high waisted pants like those on your pattern in real life and if I ever found a pair someone would have to resuscitate me.
Those are so lovely.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
