+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39

Thread: Pocket Square + Boutonniere

  1. #21
    One Too Many Josephine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,638
    Quote Originally Posted by cufflinkmaniac
    Who said anything abouit matching ties to pocket squares?
    Quote Originally Posted by widebrim
    My question to you gents out there is this: is it a faux pas to wear a matching tie and pocket square?
    Widebrim was asking.
    So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.

  2. #22
    "A List" Customer cufflinkmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Josephine
    Widebrim was asking.

    Boy do I feel dumb.
    Liturgically correct? Always.

    Sartorially correct? As often as possible.

    Politically correct? Hardly ever.

  3. #23
    One Too Many Bugsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sacramento/San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    1,113
    Be daring and wear both. I do.

    Quote Originally Posted by cufflinkmaniac
    This is the black tie look that I ultimately hope to achieve, but I have heard that wearing a pocket square and boutonniere is a faux pas. What are your thoughts (if I were to wear both the PS would be white linen)?

    [/IMG]

    Pretty suave,huh? And on a side note,what do you think about the pocket square in the link posted? I would rather have a linen PS without the border,but this one is extremely budget friendly. If anyone can offer insight as to other places where one can get a white linen pocket square on the cheap, I'd appreciate it.

    http://www.paulfredrick.com/catalog/...ategory&Slno=1

    I also plan on getting a red silk from Mens Wear House ($6.99 for a silk PS,hard to top that) to wear when not sporting a boutonniere.
    The sense of being perfectly well dressed gives a feeling of inward tranquility which religion is powerless to bestow.

    Ralph Waldo Emerson

  4. #24
    New In Town
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by Feraud
    The flipside of this thought is people try to look so casual, dashing, and classic they look extremely contrived.
    I've yet to see anyone trying to look "too casual" with a pocket square.
    Dum Vivimus, Vivamus!

  5. #25
    Incurably Addicted Baron Kurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Being slowly digested inside "The Crouching Monster" …
    Posts
    10,964
    I suspect casual was being used in rather a different sense. More effortless than lack of effort.

    Not being a wearer of pocket squares (too fussy for me) i have little to add to the discussion, so English it is.

    bk
    There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide. All the rest . . . comes afterwards. Camus

    http://baronkurtzvintage.wordpress.com/

  6. #26
    Practically Family Geesie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    718
    I've heard that it's better to coordinate the pocket square with the shirt than the tie.

  7. #27
    One of the Regulars B. F. Socaspi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    241
    Quote Originally Posted by Geesie
    I've heard that it's better to coordinate the pocket square with the shirt than the tie.
    And I've heard perfection lies in having a pocket square not overly-coordinated with the tie nor the shirt, but complimenting both.

    Why must beauty hide in the details!
    "Struggle! To struggle is to live, and the fiercer the
    struggle the intenser the life."

  8. #28
    New In Town
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    38
    The great men of style always have a practiced isouciance. Archibald Leach practiced to become Cary Grant. Gary Cooper used to drag his denim jeans & shirts behind a car until they had the proper "naturally" worn and frayed look. The key is to own your look with confidence.

    As pocket squares go, I would argue that it looks far more sterile and contrived to match the square to the tie than to show a bit of (perhaps intentional) sprezzatura.

    One would be hard pressed to show visual examples of non-tie-matching pocket squares that look contrived, whereas one can find numerous examples of silly-looking matching square-tie combos!
    Dum Vivimus, Vivamus!

  9. #29
    Incurably Addicted Baron Kurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Being slowly digested inside "The Crouching Monster" …
    Posts
    10,964
    Just look over at certain StyleForum-ites (also sometime members here). They can contrive to make anything look contrived. Or all the perfectly imperfectly angled hats up in the hats section … is 30 or 35 degrees from the horizontal brim the perfect insoucance?

    I honestly think that Cary Grant's look really does come from not caring whether something was slightly off. Not from caring that things "must be" slightly off.

    bk
    There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide. All the rest . . . comes afterwards. Camus

    http://baronkurtzvintage.wordpress.com/

  10. #30
    New In Town
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    38
    A better way to frame the matching tie-pocket square debate might be to ask, "Can anyone show visual evidence of a man widely considered to be consistently really well-dressed (e.g. Cary Grant, George Clooney, Douglas Fairbanks types) who wears matching pocket squares and ties?"
    Dum Vivimus, Vivamus!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts