Discussion in 'Suits' started by Mario, Apr 26, 2011.
Great resource, Mario. I always love to look at these.
FFF: I assume that it is my post above that you are referring to here - I was actually commenting on how nicely these 1920's illustrations were done with respect to anatomy and proportions, and how it is the Apparel Arts/Esquire pictures (especially in the 40's) that are the more distorted..... So hopefully no disagreement required
What is with all the buttoned bottom buttons on the suits and vests?
Back in the day, they knew that buttoning the bottom button was not a matter of (sartorial) life and death, but personal stylistic choice.
Ladies and gentlemen! Playing for you tonight in The Brighton Beach Ballroom: Bernard Brooks And His Buttoned Bottom Bottons!
Take a look at this 1951 photo of Cary Grant in his 3-roll-2 jacket:
While 826 is definitely ecclesiastical, 824 appears to have been intended as some sort of uniform perhaps for a valet, chauffeur or footman.
Such outfits were quite commonly worn in this period in South East Asia - could be intended for that
Pocket flaps were very often seen on midweight and heavyweight dinner jackets from about 1900 to the end of the 1930s. On the other hand, summer-weight dinner jackets (of tropical worsted wool, Palm Beach cloth, etc.) rarely had pocket flaps. Go figure.
Pocket flaps make the suit too hot for summer.
Yeah, right. By that token, lapels should have been omitted as well.
I've always loved the variety of suit lapels in this era. They're good references for someone like me who can only afford the 60s reproduction belt backs (in the sense that the purists turn their noses up at the 60s-does-30s/40s sport coats, saying the lapels make it unable to pass as a vintage style coat. To which I turn to illustrations such as these, with low lapel gorges and slightly skinnier lapels than the true 20s-40s suits they own with high, wide lapels)
(I'm open for comments on this thought)
Separate names with a comma.