Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Show us their suits

Patrick Hall

Practically Family
Messages
541
Location
Houston, TX
Here is Noel Coward in 'The Astonished Heart' (1950). He was always known as a very stylish man. Therefore, his combination of what appears to be a double breasted suit jacket (as opposed to a blazer) with what seem to be pin-striped trousers, seems rather curious. It is not a look I have seen elsewhere, apart from worn by people who couldn't afford to buy new suits. At first I thought he was wearing morning suit trousers with a blazer, which would work, but I am certain it is just an odd combination.

cowardpinstripetrousers.jpg

Mightn't Mr. Coward be in Morning Dress - a stroller and grey formal trousers?
 

herringbonekid

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,016
Location
East Sussex, England
Here is Leslie Philipps in 'The Pool of London' (1950). He is wearing a jacket with three flapped pockets, all of which have a large rounded button to close them....
The same year Dirk Bogarde appeared to wear the same jacket in 'The Blue Lamp' (the films were released six weeks apart and were both made by Ealing Studios)

very well spotted TT. definitely the same jacket. the shoulders fit Leslie better than they do Dirk.
 

Two Types

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,456
Location
London, UK
Whenever I have stumbled across vintage jackets that are three button, but have the lapels pressed to button on just two of them, I have always imagined it to be something done by accident. I had not realised it had been an intentional look. These two jackets worn by William Holden in 'Sabrina' (1954) proved me to be wrong:

holden4.jpg


holden5.jpg


In both cases the obvious buttonhole in the lower lapel indicates this was clearly an intentional look.
 

Two Types

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,456
Location
London, UK
I've watched a couple of 1940s films this weekend: 'Green for Danger' and 'Major Barbara'. In both films I have noticed something unusual: elements of style that appear more in keeping with the 1970s rather than the 1940s.

First, look at Rex Harrison's tie in 'Major Barbara'. The tie is much more rigidly constructed than most ties of the period. And the knot is much larger than is commonly seen. Add to that the loose, long collars and it just reminds me of the 1970s.
majorbarbara-kipper.jpg


And here is Alastair Sim in 'Green for Danger'. Once again, the loose collar with large and loose knot on the tie. This was the sort of knot we tried to get away with at school in the seventies. And look at the shape of his tie - nothing like most British ties in films of this period. It even has the shine of a Polyester tie and the very large Paisley print that was popular in the early seventies. Even his hat, with the rear of the brim turned down, has that 70s feel.

greenfordanger-kippertie2.jpg

greenfordanger-kippertie.jpg


But it gets worse: Robert Morley (in 'Major Barbara') is wearing a pair of glasses that come right out the seventies or early eighties!
majorbarbara-glasses.jpg
 

Two Types

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,456
Location
London, UK
However, Robert Morley redeems himself with this overcoat:
There's nothing special about the front:

majorbarbara-coatfront.jpg


But the back is marvellous:
majorbarbara-beltandpleats.jpg
 

Two Types

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,456
Location
London, UK
This is also from 'Major Barbara'. The 'screen grab' hasn't come out too clear, but this waistcoat is also flat across the front, with two very small points.
majorbarbara-waistcoat.jpg

Was this a common feature of the period (the film was made in 1941)?

Here is a good view of his suit: there is something very continental (and a bit flash) about his whole look:
majorbarbara-combination.jpg


By contrast, Rex Harrison's suit is the very model of conservatism - and looks fantastic. I think the plain bow tie is ideal with a suit of that pattern:
majorbarbara-suit.jpg
 

Two Types

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,456
Location
London, UK
Having criticised the rather large and loose tie knots worn by Sim and Harrison, here is Trevor Howard (in 'Green for Danger') displaying the complete opposite, a tiny knot worn with such precision - and at such an angle - that (in profile) one can see clearly through the gap between shirt and tie. I love how the shadow is very obvious:

greenfordanger-tieknot2.jpg


greenfordanger-tieknot.jpg


I wasn't able to grab a really clear shot, but he appears to be wearing a stiff, seperate collar, with the knot held very high.
 

TCMfan25

Practically Family
Messages
589
Location
East Coast USA
I've watched a couple of 1940s films this weekend: 'Green for Danger' and 'Major Barbara'. In both films I have noticed something unusual: elements of style that appear more in keeping with the 1970s rather than the 1940s.

First, look at Rex Harrison's tie in 'Major Barbara'. The tie is much more rigidly constructed than most ties of the period. And the knot is much larger than is commonly seen. Add to that the loose, long collars and it just reminds me of the 1970s.
majorbarbara-kipper.jpg


And here is Alastair Sim in 'Green for Danger'. Once again, the loose collar with large and loose knot on the tie. This was the sort of knot we tried to get away with at school in the seventies. And look at the shape of his tie - nothing like most British ties in films of this period. It even has the shine of a Polyester tie and the very large Paisley print that was popular in the early seventies. Even his hat, with the rear of the brim turned down, has that 70s feel.

greenfordanger-kippertie2.jpg

greenfordanger-kippertie.jpg


But it gets worse: Robert Morley (in 'Major Barbara') is wearing a pair of glasses that come right out the seventies or early eighties!
majorbarbara-glasses.jpg

Jwalls? Is that you?
 

Feraud

Bartender
Messages
17,190
Location
Hardlucksville, NY
I've watched a couple of 1940s films this weekend: 'Green for Danger' and 'Major Barbara'. In both films I have noticed something unusual: elements of style that appear more in keeping with the 1970s rather than the 1940s.
I think you mean the elements of style from the 1970s were more in keeping with the 40s. One cannot "wear it forward", so to speak. ;)
 

herringbonekid

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,016
Location
East Sussex, England
this sort of 1920s shoulder has no padding. not a little bit of padding... no padding at all. your shoulder fills out the area of sleeve where pads and sleeve-head wadding would ordinarily be doing the work. most 30s freaks don't like it as they prefer the more sculpted silhouette. me, i think there's something about a closer fitting garment that makes a guy look like he's wearing it, rather than the other way around. i blame the 9 DVD box set of Harold Lloyd films for turning me on to the 20s.

tumblr_lxnj7vHTPR1qa70eyo1_1280.jpg


the breast pocket also looks interesting.

photo courtesy of FFF.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,269
Messages
3,032,649
Members
52,727
Latest member
j2points
Top