Harness boots, particularly Frye's, were very popular back in the '60's and '70's, but I was never too crazy about the squared-off toe. They've got a new style, though, that's been haunting my dreams called the John Addison (I mentioned it elsewhere recently). Next time I see it on sale I might just pounce.
They certainly look nice
I do agree they are not in the same league even compared to my redwings. But for price/function/practicality especially for winter use they can’t be beat. In addition, they arguably look much better than the usual bulky winter boots. (Also, Expensive Fryes or Redwings slip and slide way too much on ice and the salt on the sidewalks and roads wreck havoc on those nice leather soles
)!
I cannot speak for everyone, but I do wear engineers extensively and have for the past couple of years.
Yes I know that redwings make lug sole shoes and they even have ones made especially for winter (the ice cutter model). They are $430 Canadian, while the Timberlands were $140. I do not question redwings are a better quality product. But for winter use (with all the snow, salt, mud and grime associated with it), I would rather “beat up” my Tim’s than my Beckmans or Iron rangers. For harsh winter conditions, I feel Timberlands can’t be beat for function and price and they arguably look much better than Sorel winter boots when paired with vintage looking leather jackets.
I have a few pairs of the Chippewa Made in USA models. The brown roughouts without steel toes can go all day. It really depends on the boot and your foots...
Was thinking about a pair of chippewa originals to see if it was something i could get into. As far as feet go, i've been dealt a bad hand. Flat and arthritic.
Yeah, I understand - wife has that issue too. She has to get really expensive shoes/boots but it's all good.
I agree “to each his own”
I would spend the money to have hard wearing, quality boots for harsh conditions if I needed to. I'm with you on this one.
