Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Casablanca Version: "Perfidia." Where to find?

scotrace

Head Bartender
Staff member
Messages
14,376
Location
Small Town Ohio, USA
In the greatest film of all time, Casablanca, Ilsa and Rick dance at a Paris club to a particular, up-tempo version of "Perfidia" (it also appears in Now Voyager, with Paul Henried and Bette Davis doing the dancing, the same exact clip). I like that version better than any other, and can't find who recorded it, or a copy of it. I doesn't appear to be on the soundtrack. Anyone know where to look ???
 

FedoraGent

One Too Many
Messages
1,221
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
I have it...

scotrace said:
In the greatest film of all time, Casablanca, Ilsa and Rick dance at a Paris club to a particular, up-tempo version of "Perfidia" (it also appears in Now Voyager, with Paul Henried and Bette Davis doing the dancing, the same exact clip). I like that version better than any other, and can't find who recorded it, or a copy of it. I doesn't appear to be on the soundtrack. Anyone know where to look ???
Scott,

As you and the other Loungers know...I collect such mindless things. I have it in digital format...send me an PM and I'll email you a link where you can download that and the other versions of Perfidia.

BTW, it's one of my favorites.

FG.
 

Marlin Fan

Familiar Face
Messages
66
Location
The Outer Rim
FedoraGent said:
Scott,

As you and the other Loungers know...I collect such mindless things. I have it in digital format...send me an PM and I'll email you a link where you can download that and the other versions of Perfidia.

BTW, it's one of my favorites.

FG.

Can I get the link too??
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,040
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
It probably wasn't a commercial recording -- Warners would have to pay to license such a recording for film use, and why, you can hear J. L. asking, would they ever bother to do that when they're already paying Leo Forbstien and his boys to orchestrate and perform any sort of music that might be required for any scene? Commercial records were pretty much never used on film soundtracks during the Era for such reasons -- if an "original hit" version was required for a film, you'd see the actual orchestra brought in for a guest-star bit, and they'd make a fresh recording specifically for film use. ("Oh, look, Lance -- Tommy Dorsey's playing here! Do let's go inside!")

All that said, no version of "Perfidia" beats Benny Goodman's. Gene Krupa did a nice version too, with some of the same hokey "Latin" effects that Cugat used, but with an entirely different set of lyrics, under the title "Tonight."
 

MikeKardec

One Too Many
Messages
1,157
Location
Los Angeles
It probably wasn't a commercial recording -- Warners would have to pay to license such a recording for film use, and why, you can hear J. L. asking, would they ever bother to do that when they're already paying Leo Forbstien and his boys to orchestrate and perform any sort of music that might be required for any scene? Commercial records were pretty much never used on film soundtracks during the Era for such reasons --

Lizzie is right even for movies today (I doubt the rules have changed much). The original recording of a popular piece of music is expensive to license. Less expensive is a cover of the original piece. Even less expensive is to have your film's composer write you a new song that the film/the studio owns outright.

A soundtrack of original classic rock recordings was too expensive for the Son's of Anarchy TV series so they created their own cover band, The Forest Rangers, to redo all the vintage hits they wanted to use. Eventually, they produced new music for the show on their own and with guest talent and became an in-demand act at music festivals. They, or their spin off band The Reluctant Apostles, are still preforming music that has no relationship to the show.

Streets of Fire, a film nearly forgotten, still has it's rock and roll sound track played on the radio. They couldn't afford Bruce Springsteen (who's music was mostly unavailable for films at any price in those days) so they hired Rye Cooder to create them a similar sounding soundtrack and he did a pretty amazing job, channeling many Springsteen qualities without ever getting so close that he couldn't take pride in it in his own right.
 
Messages
16,862
Location
New York City
Lizzie is right even for movies today (I doubt the rules have changed much). The original recording of a popular piece of music is expensive to license. Less expensive is a cover of the original piece. Even less expensive is to have your film's composer write you a new song that the film/the studio owns outright.

A soundtrack of original classic rock recordings was too expensive for the Son's of Anarchy TV series so they created their own cover band, The Forest Rangers, to redo all the vintage hits they wanted to use. Eventually, they produced new music for the show on their own and with guest talent and became an in-demand act at music festivals. They, or their spin off band The Reluctant Apostles, are still preforming music that has no relationship to the show.

Streets of Fire, a film nearly forgotten, still has it's rock and roll sound track played on the radio. They couldn't afford Bruce Springsteen (who's music was mostly unavailable for films at any price in those days) so they hired Rye Cooder to create them a similar sounding soundtrack and he did a pretty amazing job, channeling many Springsteen qualities without ever getting so close that he couldn't take pride in it in his own right.

Mike, great info as always. When a studio buys a cover version - do both the cover band musicians and the original song writers get paid? So, for example, when a no-name band does a cover of, say, The Rolling Stones "Gimme Shelter," do the cover band musicians get paid and Jagger and Richards as the writers? I would assume so, but you, I'm sure, will know.

And if so, this implies that writer royalties aren't that big, i.e., it's expensive to buy the original Stones-performed version, but not that expensive to pay the writing fees to Mick and Keith when their song is recorded by another band?

It's been a long time since I've seen "Streets of Fire," but remember it as working in a kinda campy way with a soundtrack that worked well in the movie, but can't say I've thought about the music independent of the film.
 
Messages
16,862
Location
New York City
It probably wasn't a commercial recording -- Warners would have to pay to license such a recording for film use, and why, you can hear J. L. asking, would they ever bother to do that when they're already paying Leo Forbstien and his boys to orchestrate and perform any sort of music that might be required for any scene? Commercial records were pretty much never used on film soundtracks during the Era for such reasons -- if an "original hit" version was required for a film, you'd see the actual orchestra brought in for a guest-star bit, and they'd make a fresh recording specifically for film use. ("Oh, look, Lance -- Tommy Dorsey's playing here! Do let's go inside!")

All that said, no version of "Perfidia" beats Benny Goodman's. Gene Krupa did a nice version too, with some of the same hokey "Latin" effects that Cugat used, but with an entirely different set of lyrics, under the title "Tonight."

Just listened to it. I haven't heard all the version of "Perfidia," so can't rank it, but that is an outstanding one.
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,040
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
That 1940-41 Goodman band isn't as well-known as the 1930s "Carnegie Hall" version, but it's even more sophisticated in its approach. They did a 12-inch side for Columbia of "More Than You Know" with the same vocalist, Helen Forrest, that's absolutely breathtaking.
 
Messages
16,862
Location
New York City
That 1940-41 Goodman band isn't as well-known as the 1930s "Carnegie Hall" version, but it's even more sophisticated in its approach. They did a 12-inch side for Columbia of "More Than You Know" with the same vocalist, Helen Forrest, that's absolutely breathtaking.

I look it up. Her vocals on "Perfidia" are impressive.
 

Edward

Bartender
Messages
24,779
Location
London, UK
Lizzie is right even for movies today (I doubt the rules have changed much). The original recording of a popular piece of music is expensive to license. Less expensive is a cover of the original piece. Even less expensive is to have your film's composer write you a new song that the film/the studio owns outright.

A soundtrack of original classic rock recordings was too expensive for the Son's of Anarchy TV series so they created their own cover band, The Forest Rangers, to redo all the vintage hits they wanted to use. Eventually, they produced new music for the show on their own and with guest talent and became an in-demand act at music festivals. They, or their spin off band The Reluctant Apostles, are still preforming music that has no relationship to the show.

I wasn't aware they'd done that for budgetary reasons in Sons of Anarchy, but it is indeed a common approach in the entertainment industry. Pay one royalty - the copyright on the original song - and pay out the actual performers a one-of, session fee, not the ongoing royalties that an established act would undoubtedly demand.

Spills over into advertising too: for years Vauxhall (GM) in the UK used what everyone thought was Clapton's introit to Leyla on their ads. In reality, it was a cover from a session musician who had very skilfully mimicked the original for a one-of session fee, cutting the budget significantly.

The SoA soundtrack is, of course, one example where creative thinking forced by a budget actually ended up with something much more artistically interesting than just using the original cuts. (Often, I actually much preferred their cover.)
 

MikeKardec

One Too Many
Messages
1,157
Location
Los Angeles
Mike, great info as always. When a studio buys a cover version - do both the cover band musicians and the original song writers get paid? So, for example, when a no-name band does a cover of, say, The Rolling Stones "Gimme Shelter," do the cover band musicians get paid and Jagger and Richards as the writers? I would assume so, but you, I'm sure, will know.

And if so, this implies that writer royalties aren't that big, i.e., it's expensive to buy the original Stones-performed version, but not that expensive to pay the writing fees to Mick and Keith when their song is recorded by another band?

It's been a long time since I've seen "Streets of Fire," but remember it as working in a kinda campy way with a soundtrack that worked well in the movie, but can't say I've thought about the music independent of the film.

Yes you are correct, everyone gets paid, just different amounts. I think the real expense hurtle is the music publisher's $$$ rather than the writer's. If you remove the original recording the publisher has less to try and claim as their investment. Just a guess, however. I've been involved in negotiations like this but only to be told "No, you can't have that music, there's no budget for it."

I was wrong about Streets of Fire, the music producer was Jimmy Iovine not Cooder, though Cooder wrote a song for it. Not a great film though a fun idea. The album, though not terribly successful, just went on and on. Longevity must mean something, I guess.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,230
Messages
3,031,539
Members
52,699
Latest member
Bergsma112
Top