Field Leathers

zebedee · Apr 8, 2020

Docxm said:
To everyone saying it's way too long: I agree, I already noted that. It's a nice unique piece and part of the history of what I hope will be a great one man brand. Im just happy to support. Also, the cost of shortening it would be more than what I paid for it so it's just going to be part of my collection until I get fat.

Edit: it was also a good lesson for this leather jacket novice to understand that even though key measurements are the same, two jackets will fit differently

Wear it anyway. There are far more egregious fit errors. Kudos to you for picking it up.

Seb Lucas · Apr 8, 2020

Mawashi said:
That's some look, oversized and 2" too long sleeves lol.

Something I doubt most Europeans or for that matter me, would consider ever wearing.

Sounds about right, 3 - 4 cm should do the trick.

Twenty to thirty years ago people wore jackets sized like this far more often. The more fitted look was re-discovered in recent years. I don't mind a baggy leather jacket. Even Indy wore one like this the 2008 sequal.

film.

zebedee · Apr 8, 2020

Seb Lucas said:
Twenty to thirty years ago people wore jackets sized like this far more often. The more fitted look was re-discovered in recent years. I don't mind a baggy leather jacket. Even Indy wore one like this the 2008 sequal. View attachment 226067 film.

Looking at vintage pictures or wearers and jackets, I can't see that 'fit' was about all that much more than perception due to trouser rise.

Mawashi · Apr 9, 2020

Docxm said:
To everyone saying it's way too long: I agree, I already noted that. It's a nice unique piece and part of the history of what I hope will be a great one man brand. Im just happy to support. Also, the cost of shortening it would be more than what I paid for it so it's just going to be part of my collection until I get fat.

Edit: it was also a good lesson for this leather jacket novice to understand that even though key measurements are the same, two jackets will fit differently

The jacket looks great no question, I can't really tell if it's baggy cos of the distance, the sleeves are just slightly long but not unfashionably so.

Personally this is a great first jacket as it's cheap, workmanship is great, for the price, you can wear it w/o a care in the world so wear it like Indy lol.

Hh121 · Apr 9, 2020

Seb Lucas said:
Twenty to thirty years ago people wore jackets sized like this far more often. The more fitted look was re-discovered in recent years. I don't mind a baggy leather jacket. Even Indy wore one like this the 2008 sequal. View attachment 226067 film.

It's more relax fit than baggy, he looks great with this jacket.

Hh121 · Apr 9, 2020

Docxm said:
So I bought the sample HB in Black Cowhide and just received it. I don't have much experience or much to compare it to (only my Tenjin is even in the same realm), but I really love the paneling and design, and the stitching is amazing for a quick mockup/sample.

Unfortunately, the sleeves are too roomy and long for me. Still, it was a sample and bought for basically pennies, so I'll make do. I really just wanted to support someone who's trying to do big things. It also has the original old logo Greg drafted up for Field Leathers, so it's a pretty unique piece.

I'll probably order a custom/MTO jacket in the future once I'm more financial assured. I don't think anyone who orders one from Greg will be disappointed. Best of luck to Field Leathers!

I would like to see the back, you can use it as a mid length coat, with sleeves shortened you should be OK.

Kuro · Apr 9, 2020

Seb Lucas said:
Twenty to thirty years ago people wore jackets sized like this far more often. The more fitted look was re-discovered in recent years. I don't mind a baggy leather jacket. Even Indy wore one like this the 2008 sequal. View attachment 226067 film.

Consider the transition from high waist pants to low waist pants as well. The jackets made to a vintage standard may not have changed at all, but our perception of how they fit may have changed because our belts have moved.

Docxm · Apr 9, 2020

Hh121 said:
I would like to see the back, you can use it as a mid length coat, with sleeves shortened you should be OK.

Here ya go. Extra material on the arm is obvious from this angle, with my arm bent. Body fits me pretty well, though!

Mawashi · Apr 9, 2020

Docxm said:
Here ya go. Extra material on the arm is obvious from this angle, with my arm bent. Body fits me pretty well, though!

Looks fine imo! My take is go for the sleeve shortening as you're not going to keep your arms bent forever.

If it costs 100 to get it shortened ill do it cos u really want to enjoy the jacket and not get irritated w too long sleeves for example.

dudewuttheheck · Apr 9, 2020

I'm gonna be honest, that jacket doesn't look as good on Harrison Ford there as his earlier Indy jackets look.

Seb Lucas · Apr 9, 2020

dudewuttheheck said:
I'm gonna be honest, that jacket doesn't look as good on Harrison Ford there as his earlier Indy jackets look.

Totally agree. Look at the shoulders the damn jacket is two sizes too big. The issue is it is cow and drapes badly and is in a horrible pre-distressed hide. The other Indy jackets were lambskin that draped really well and were much better aged. Same baggy cut.

My point was simply that over-sized is a look. I sometimes don't mind it as the whole trim, hipster fit of today which 'quotes' vintage wearing aesthetic sometimes gets boring.

Seb Lucas · Apr 9, 2020

Docxm said:
Here ya go. Extra material on the arm is obvious from this angle, with my arm bent. Body fits me pretty well, though!

Arms look fine. I have a few jackets that are like that. If you are trim and find bicep curls irrelevant, you have thin arms and sometimes wider sleeves.

navetsea · Apr 9, 2020

is the cuff leather on both sides if so just cuff up the sleeve

Mich486 · Apr 9, 2020

I don’t mind a relaxed fit, in fact I quite like it. However, there are jacket designs that look good if oversized and others which are meant to fit trim or look off. Imho this pattern falls into the second category.

handymike · Apr 9, 2020

@Docxm you seem to be in SF. After lock-down is over, take it to Alan@Johnson Leathers. He’ll fix the fit any way you like.

dubpynchon · Apr 9, 2020

I’d definitely get the arms shortened if they bother you, the rest looks good. I’ve had to have the arms shortened on a few of my Vansons due to their motorcycle length sleeves, it’s worth it to get rid of the irritation.

dudewuttheheck · Apr 9, 2020

Seb Lucas said:
Totally agree. Look at the shoulders the damn jacket is two sizes too big. The issue is it is cow and drapes badly and is in a horrible pre-distressed hide. The other Indy jackets were lambskin that draped really well and were much better aged. Same baggy cut.

My point was simply that over-sized is a look. I sometimes don't mind it as the whole trim, hipster fit of today which 'quotes' vintage wearing aesthetic sometimes gets boring.

Yeah in fairness his jackets were a little big in the first films too, but the lambskin definitely helped. It fit with his whole aesthetic. I do think the jacket we're talking about here from Field Leathers is way too long in the sleeves at the very least though.

Mandarin · Jun 13, 2020

Of all the reasons that make Field leathers jackets attractive, the choice of hides is to me the most important one. I was particularly attracted to shinki, and for the first time, a maker based in Europe provided the opportunity to experience it for an affordable price, and without the hassle of taxes and customs. When Greg posted some of his jackets in the classifieds, I spotted the Manhattan, and after some time, I finally pulled the trigger.
Unlike some of the Field leathers jackets recently acquired by fellow loungers, this one wasn't made to measure (at least not mine). It's sort of off the rack for me, so there was a bit of a gamble. I asked Greg for a few precisions, and it turns out we're both the same size, so the way he models it gave me a good idea of the way the jacket would fit me. It's the one that's featured on the website, so there's many detailed pictures of it. https://fieldleathers.com/product/leather-jacket-three/
When unwrapping it, the first strong impression comes form the smell: subtle but strong, quite alluring with a touch of citrus, if ever that makes sense. Another striking feature is visual: the texture is incredible, and the panels seem to have been chosen to distribute the grainier parts where they're most visible, on the arms and back. The touch is great as well, soft and consistant. It really is the leather that stands out in this jacket. The rest is impressive too: the style is inspired by the Buco J 24, and the construction and stitching are obviously set to a high standard. I'm not a stitch counter, but I couldn't find a flaw. If I would've been given the choice, I probably wouldn't have chosen the quilted lining, but I'm glad it's there. The color's beautiful, and
the lining is in no way too warm, nor thick.
Fit is just right. I was afraid it would be a little tight in the shoulders but they're perfectly comfortable, and although the fit is not boxy at all, it still gives room to layer if necessary. Length is almost short, but I'm getting familiar with this kind of size.
A few pics:

Kuro · Jun 13, 2020

Mandarin said:
Of all the reasons that make Field leathers jackets attractive, the choice of hides is to me the most important one. I was particularly attracted to shinki, and for the first time, a maker based in Europe provided the opportunity to experience it for an affordable price, and without the hassle of taxes and customs. When Greg posted some of his jackets in the classifieds, I spotted the Manhattan, and after some time, I finally pulled the trigger.
Unlike some of the Field leathers jackets recently acquired by fellow loungers, this one wasn't made to measure (at least not mine). It's sort of off the rack for me, so there was a bit of a gamble. I asked Greg for a few precisions, and it turns out we're both the same size, so the way he models it gave me a good idea of the way the jacket would fit me. It's the one that's featured on the website, so there's many detailed pictures of it. https://fieldleathers.com/product/leather-jacket-three/
When unwrapping it, the first strong impression comes form the smell: subtle but strong, quite alluring with a touch of citrus, if ever that makes sense. Another striking feature is visual: the texture is incredible, and the panels seem to have been chosen to distribute the grainier parts where they're most visible, on the arms and back. The touch is great as well, soft and consistant. It really is the leather that stands out in this jacket. The rest is impressive too: the style is inspired by the Buco J 24, and the construction and stitching are obviously set to a high standard. I'm not a stitch counter, but I couldn't find a flaw. If I would've been given the choice, I probably wouldn't have chosen the quilted lining, but I'm glad it's there. The color's beautiful, and
the lining is in no way too warm, nor thick.
Fit is just right. I was afraid it would be a little tight in the shoulders but they're perfectly comfortable, and although the fit is not boxy at all, it still gives room to layer if necessary. Length is almost short, but I'm getting familiar with this kind of size.
A few pics:

View attachment 241485

View attachment 241486

Congrats! I really like the fit and the design.

That is really nice.

Thank you for sharing you review!

dubpynchon · Jun 13, 2020

Mandarin said:
Of all the reasons that make Field leathers jackets attractive, the choice of hides is to me the most important one. I was particularly attracted to shinki, and for the first time, a maker based in Europe provided the opportunity to experience it for an affordable price, and without the hassle of taxes and customs. When Greg posted some of his jackets in the classifieds, I spotted the Manhattan, and after some time, I finally pulled the trigger.
Unlike some of the Field leathers jackets recently acquired by fellow loungers, this one wasn't made to measure (at least not mine). It's sort of off the rack for me, so there was a bit of a gamble. I asked Greg for a few precisions, and it turns out we're both the same size, so the way he models it gave me a good idea of the way the jacket would fit me. It's the one that's featured on the website, so there's many detailed pictures of it. https://fieldleathers.com/product/leather-jacket-three/
When unwrapping it, the first strong impression comes form the smell: subtle but strong, quite alluring with a touch of citrus, if ever that makes sense. Another striking feature is visual: the texture is incredible, and the panels seem to have been chosen to distribute the grainier parts where they're most visible, on the arms and back. The touch is great as well, soft and consistant. It really is the leather that stands out in this jacket. The rest is impressive too: the style is inspired by the Buco J 24, and the construction and stitching are obviously set to a high standard. I'm not a stitch counter, but I couldn't find a flaw. If I would've been given the choice, I probably wouldn't have chosen the quilted lining, but I'm glad it's there. The color's beautiful, and
the lining is in no way too warm, nor thick.
Fit is just right. I was afraid it would be a little tight in the shoulders but they're perfectly comfortable, and although the fit is not boxy at all, it still gives room to layer if necessary. Length is almost short, but I'm getting familiar with this kind of size.
A few pics:

View attachment 241485

View attachment 241486

It looks perfect, congrats.

Field Leathers

One Too Many

I'll Lock Up

One Too Many

One of the Regulars

Banned

Banned

Practically Family

Familiar Face

One of the Regulars

I'll Lock Up

I'll Lock Up

I'll Lock Up

I'll Lock Up

One Too Many

One Too Many

I'll Lock Up

Practically Family

Attachments

Practically Family

One Too Many

Similar threads

Log in

Forum statistics