Harp
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 8,508
- Location
- Chicago, IL US
The Guggenheim embroglio over marital estate division and primacy of dower right in law
recalls to mind the case of the late singer Frankie Lymon whose Why Do Fools Fall in Love? signature
song heralded a fast flare felled star who tragically died from a heroin overdose circa 1964.
Three women came forward to claim his estate, substantial by normal run of the mill but rather
low ball by entertainment industry standard; all claimed marital status or common law equivalence.
A flick was made so I learned about this all after the fact, and one of gals, the legally married to,
caught my eye so I was dragged inside the story, which in law amounted to three cows sashaying
down the trail but only one of 'em wearing a bell. The learned judge decided all three partake equal
cuts of pie but in my opinion the judge committed what is known as 'judicial error.'
Such bench error constitutes appellate ground; however, an insufficient estate cumulative; other women
who might step forward and petition to join suit during appeal; garnish, estate, state of California censure;
and wear-and-tear property maintenance, all lumped together with attorney fees whittled it all down
to a pragmatic settle and saddle up scenario.
Guggenheim is quite different and I believe suit was filed in New York which favors Mom and the kid,
which with dower right-an established legal claim principle should seal verdict. And, of course, the estate
diminution fact-or-fiction begs resolve.
_____________
I do not know why Sky King and Terry did not fight back against capture.
Obviously, Terry's presence ensures that at least he survives....
recalls to mind the case of the late singer Frankie Lymon whose Why Do Fools Fall in Love? signature
song heralded a fast flare felled star who tragically died from a heroin overdose circa 1964.
Three women came forward to claim his estate, substantial by normal run of the mill but rather
low ball by entertainment industry standard; all claimed marital status or common law equivalence.
A flick was made so I learned about this all after the fact, and one of gals, the legally married to,
caught my eye so I was dragged inside the story, which in law amounted to three cows sashaying
down the trail but only one of 'em wearing a bell. The learned judge decided all three partake equal
cuts of pie but in my opinion the judge committed what is known as 'judicial error.'
Such bench error constitutes appellate ground; however, an insufficient estate cumulative; other women
who might step forward and petition to join suit during appeal; garnish, estate, state of California censure;
and wear-and-tear property maintenance, all lumped together with attorney fees whittled it all down
to a pragmatic settle and saddle up scenario.
Guggenheim is quite different and I believe suit was filed in New York which favors Mom and the kid,
which with dower right-an established legal claim principle should seal verdict. And, of course, the estate
diminution fact-or-fiction begs resolve.
_____________
I do not know why Sky King and Terry did not fight back against capture.
Obviously, Terry's presence ensures that at least he survives....
