Vintage Betty
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,300
- Location
- California, USA
Smuterella said:
One that someone does for me so I don't have to do all the work?
-
The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
'gaudy' eBay Photos?
- Thread starter Paisley
- Start date
One that someone does for me so I don't have to do all the work?
gluegungeisha
Practically Family
- Messages
- 648
- Location
- Albuquerque, New Mexico
Real Swell Gal said:
Sure, the outfit is bold, and not in everyone's taste. However, I don't see what the model did to solicit such comments about her body, if we're only talking about the outfit she was dressed in.
Maybe it just rubs me the wrong way because I have been an "Ebay/Etsy model" for a few nice people who wanted to have their designs and old clothes modeled on my body type. I did it as a favor, not because I thought I was looking super-cool in my poofy dresses. Example (because I'm confident enough to laugh at myself...):
80's butt-bow, weird background and lighting, and awkward nose shadow.
Not Ebay, but still selling something. It was at a benefit called "66 Roses" for people with cystic fibrosis...hence the flowers. I was also modeling a corset for a local designer, which you can barely even see due to the angle the photographer chose. They had someone come in to do my hair, which is why my bangs were flying everywhere. I didn't even choose the pose! I did it because it was for a great cause.
So...keep in mind that the model does not always make these choices.
That is all.
Real Swell Gal
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 277
- Location
- Ohio
I think you're making a bigger deal out of this than what it is.
Again, lighten up.
The internet = serious business
Again, lighten up.
The internet = serious business
- Messages
- 9,087
- Location
- Crummy town, USA
I Dont care if the photo is crappy or not in how its modeled, (that can sometimes work in your favor price wise) so long as the photos are acurate, measurements are as well, and the description is strong.
Show it two or three ways, modern, maniquin and hanging.
LD
Show it two or three ways, modern, maniquin and hanging.
LD
Foofoogal
Banned
- Messages
- 4,884
- Location
- Vintage Land
you and me both. I detest taking photos. My mannequin is about 6.0 and I am 5.1 3/4
Me and her have quite a relationship going. lol She doesn't like me much chunking her around. She is missing hands though so I have the upper hand.
I mainly don't like when the item looks like an ant with lots of background and you cannot see anything.
I will admit, I do find it a bit irritating when people will take 20s, Edwardian clothing and add modern sneakers and leggings with them. I try to look past it, though, and focus on the item.
One thing that annoys me is when people sell vintage swimsuits, with live models wearing them. I always wash everything I buy off eBay before I wear it, anyways... but sometimes I get a bit grossed out.
One thing that annoys me is when people sell vintage swimsuits, with live models wearing them. I always wash everything I buy off eBay before I wear it, anyways... but sometimes I get a bit grossed out.
Mike in Seattle
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,027
- Location
- Renton (Seattle), WA
OK...I'll have to toss this in, but I'm sure it's been mentioned elsewhere...people who post "vintage" items from the 90's. Or "antiques" from the 1970's... I just picked up a pair of 1998 "antique" Trafalgar braces on Ebay the other day...
Andfftopic: and on another board recently, I was commenting on someone's post about their writing an "autobiography of Oscar Hammerstein..."
Some of you are laughing...some of you are saying "What's funny about that?"
And
fftopic: and on another board recently, I was commenting on someone's post about their writing an "autobiography of Oscar Hammerstein..."Some of you are laughing...some of you are saying "What's funny about that?"
- Messages
- 9,087
- Location
- Crummy town, USA
Mike in Seattle said:
I didnt know someone else could do that! lolLD
LizzieMaine
Bartender
- Messages
- 33,040
- Location
- Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
Lady Day said:
My sentiments exactly. It's also a good thing to see closeup photos of maker labels and any union labels that might be present.
SarahLouise
Practically Family
- Messages
- 521
- Location
- London, UK
I really couldn't care less if the item is shown with an outfit that is not totally period correct. I prefer clothes to be shown on mannequins, front and back views, with measurements (why some sellers list clothes without measurements I'll never know) and the condition, noting any holes and stains. I've lost count of the number of vintage items I've had to send back because of very obvious stains/tears that I cannot repair which were not mentioned in the description. Some items you can save, some you can't! Having said that, blurry photographs can help you grab a bargain - I won a 1940s sheer button up rayon crepe dress for £4 because the photo wasn't very clear.
ShortClara
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,117
- Location
- .
I think to expect mannequin/ dress form and a live person model is crazy, from the perspective of the seller. That's two different shoots, dressing two different times. I guess it would be nice, but I know how much work it is to put up a professional looking ebay listing, and one or the other is fine with me. I would not do both, unless I knew my return would be guaranteed outstanding. You'll never please everyone anyway. But for me when listing, labels, complete measurements, close ups of materials and flaws, etc are a MUST.
But for me when listing, labels, complete measurements, close ups of materials and flaws, etc are a MUST.
I worry about the garment itsef when worn in crazy ensembles or poses. It could be a fragile peice and they're stretching it or pulling it.. possibly popping seams, ect.
Another reason I don't mind if they don't use a mannequin. If they don't know what they're doing, I'd rather them just lay the garment on the bed instead of trying to yank it over a manny... which can be very akward at times. Even if the model is petit enough, moving in weird poses can ruin a frock.
So I guess I do get "put off" because I feel they're not taking proper care of the vintage duds. Esp. edwardian stuff.
Nikki
Another reason I don't mind if they don't use a mannequin. If they don't know what they're doing, I'd rather them just lay the garment on the bed instead of trying to yank it over a manny... which can be very akward at times. Even if the model is petit enough, moving in weird poses can ruin a frock.
So I guess I do get "put off" because I feel they're not taking proper care of the vintage duds. Esp. edwardian stuff.
Nikki
If you don't like the photo or need a close up of something you can always ask the seller to take another picture for you.
I don't care who models it, what the pose is or what it is paired with as long as the photo's are clear, the desription and the measurements are correct.
I don't care who models it, what the pose is or what it is paired with as long as the photo's are clear, the desription and the measurements are correct.
