Aero 1920s Original Hercules

Discussion in 'Outerwear' started by schitzo, Apr 10, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. thor

    thor One Too Many

    Messages:
    1,925
    Location:
    NYC, NY
    image.jpg
    File this phenomenon under "The X Files" (or maybe The Twilight Zone?). SOMETHING happened to Schitz's jacket. What factors were involved and what the root cause is can be guessed at but will we ever conclusively know for sure?
    I wish there was some definitive answer. Hopefully nothing like this ever happens again in the future (to anyone).
     
  2. schitzo

    schitzo Suspended

    Messages:
    1,472
    Location:
    London
    I can't agree with you here Fanch. As I see it there are 3 lengths of halfbelt. Shorter ones like the '30s HB', standard length ones like the '50s HB' and longer length ones like the 'cropduster', 'hercules' and aptly named 'Long Half Belt'

    For standard length I'd go around 26 inches long, possibly a bit more but not more than 27". For long length I'm 28 - 29" and for the short ones 25" is right for me. Ken looked at me in this jacket and told me 24.5" was long enough - so evidently he considers this model a short one. On this, I definitely do agree with him. Had I have tacked on another 2 inches here that would have made it 27" long! That's longer than I'd go for with a 50s HB, which of course is a much looser fitting jacket. For a size 38 in this model (my size) the fit is trim (even trimmer now of course) and so adding on a shedload of extra length is IMHO really not such a smart move for this pattern. Possibly, had I sized up then adding this type of extra length wouldn't have been such a disaster. But of course, what originally attracted me to this jacket was its fit and shape, not the prospect of me remoulding into something very different.

    On the topic of height I am between 6,1" and 6,2", not that that makes a lot of difference I realise. But as for having a long torso.. I've got other people telling me my legs are long! All of which makes me suspect that probably neither are


    You mean you aren't buying aero's diagnosis that me packing it in a suitcase caused it? Fair enough. I personally thought the fabrics guy from the other thread made a lot of sense when he said this:

    "Working in the field of stress and strain in materials for 30 years, what first comes to mind it tension induced buckling. Where would that tension come from? Looking at the fine close stitching I would guess that the stitching is very tight and as the leather is softening the tension in the stitching is drawing the panels in. The upper chest symmetric creases look to be a result of both the shoulder stitching and the arm stitching drawing in the softening leather. The back panels also seem to be affected by this same tight stitching overcoming the leather. The arms might be freed from this phenomenon due to the amount of flexing they receive from normal wear possibly loosening the stitching and reaching an equilibrium with the leather."

    The leather on it is quite soft now and as you can see it does seem to have tightened up all over. So for the triple stitching to have played a pivotal role here is in my mind not inconceivable. Perhaps that would also help explain the awesome grain that's popped out all over it, the likes of which I have never before seen on Horween FQHH
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2014
  3. Plumbline

    Plumbline One Too Many

    Messages:
    1,271
    Location:
    UK
    I was once told by a VERY reptable leather jacket maker ( Jimmy Aird ) that the shortest and tightest a leather jacket will ever be is when you put it on for the first time. In all of the leather jackets I have ever owned ( and that's a LOT of jackets) this has always been the case barring a little bit of shortening of sleeves due to creasing ( which soon fixes itself with wear)

    This is most definately NOT the case with this jacket for whatever reason ......

    Hat's off to you Schitzo .. I thought it short and tight when you got it ( no surprise there) ..... now you look like you're wearing your wee brothers jacket ( and not in a good way)

    Sell it to a short skinny person and buy one that fits next time :) :) :)
     
  4. Don Tomaso

    Don Tomaso A-List Customer

    Messages:
    402
    Location:
    Germany
    Well, that's way too small and I don't see this is due to the jacket "accentuating your body". Someting happend and the jacket is an ex-Schitzo-jacket now, so to say. Sell it and get on, would be my advise. As for the reasons, no idea, but is it important?
     
  5. repo

    repo Familiar Face

    Messages:
    59
    Location:
    Uk
    Well I don't want the same thing to happen to any of my jackets, so I would say it is important.
     
  6. Don Tomaso

    Don Tomaso A-List Customer

    Messages:
    402
    Location:
    Germany
    Well, ok, good point.
     
  7. zhz

    zhz Practically Family

    Messages:
    890
    Location:
    China, London and Coventry UK
    Agree with repo, if we dont what really caused the shrinkage to the leather, it is hard to decide the size of the jacket... that says, if you order a jacket just fit to size, like schitzo's, what do you do if it shrink? Or if you order a jacket that is larger, because you think it will shrink, then what do you do if it doesnt shrink...you can not always do the buy/sell game...
     
  8. nick123

    nick123 I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    6,287
    Location:
    California
    I really don't think there are enough cases of this to panic. Would I order a 1920s Hercules and ask for the same grainy horsehide batch as Schitzo's? I wouldn't after seeing this. But that's me being conservative. Supposedly a bunch of other jackets made from this same batch have gone out, and nobody has come forward with a complaint, so maybe it's really only a freak case. Hard to tell if the shrinking is attributed to the leather, environmental conditions, or the design, but so far no one else has come forward with any kind of major shrinking. Dav's lost a few inches, but since so very few people have come forward, I feel it's pretty rare. If 99.9% of the jackets don't do this, that's enough confidence for me to not worry too much about it.
     
  9. Seb Lucas

    Seb Lucas I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    7,575
    Location:
    Australia
    Or Nick, maybe if it has happened to others, they didn't notice because the jacket was not as tight and short to begin with. If you're six feet two (like me) and the jacket was 27 inches (the ideal length for a short jacket IMO) and it looses one inch, you may not notice because your belt is still covered.
     
  10. nick123

    nick123 I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    6,287
    Location:
    California
    Totally. Schitz was the prime candidate to have noticed it, given it was as short as he wanted it. If this happens more often, someone with say a Vest De Rallye wouldn't notice it, given it's a roomier and longer jacket. But then there's the sleeves. I suppose they'll crease anyway for many people. Maybe the length loss and tightening do happen more frequently but no one is affected by it!
     
  11. thor

    thor One Too Many

    Messages:
    1,925
    Location:
    NYC, NY
    Schitz, ol' chum, I've bunched up and balled up and rolled up various leather jackets into military duffle bags for transits abroad and none have ever creased to the point of unrecoverable shrinkage. Methinks that something else is a more likely explanation, though I know not what it might be.
     
  12. Sloan1874

    Sloan1874 I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    8,366
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Genuine request, no mickey taking: can we get side-on and rear view shots, or a vid of you giving us a twirl? I think that would be helpful.
     
  13. schitzo

    schitzo Suspended

    Messages:
    1,472
    Location:
    London
    I had to laugh when I read these. Thanks for the tip plum!

    It is if I wanted to buy another. And I'd guess for anyone else considering one it would be too


    Worst is, I'm an obsessive packer and pack with military precision, taking care that the items I like are nicely cushioned and carefully contained. With a jacket like this I more than likely rolled it around a bunch of soft stuff and covered it with more of the same to avoid any unsightly creases. Though I know from prior experience that if you do get some they fall out with wear and don't, as a general rule of thumb, inflict shrinkage

    When I snapped that frontal I also took a few of the back, though they weren't as clear. If I feel like it later, perhaps I'll upload one anyway. Or try to get a better one. I can assure the house that there is nobody doing a Del boy (to Rodney) behind me in the shot posted, or any other monkey business to speak of.
    As for me dancing for you on camera.. I suggest that if you want a man for that type of thing you need to log into one of your other virtual hangouts. HTH
     
  14. Sloan1874

    Sloan1874 I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    8,366
    Location:
    Glasgow
    A simple no would suffice, Schitz. I'm not suggesting any 'monkey business' but if you don't want the Lounge to help you find a solution that's fine. As it stands, pics by themselves don't seem to have done the trick. There's no need to be unpleasant about it, that's all.
     
  15. Plumbline

    Plumbline One Too Many

    Messages:
    1,271
    Location:
    UK
    I don't think some members have been particularly helpful up till now Sloanie !!!!! .. which may be the reason behind Schitzo's prickliness ..... just a suggestion !
     
  16. Rudie

    Rudie Call Me a Cab

    Messages:
    2,042
    Location:
    Berlin
    I can't imagine packing to be the cause. When I broke in my Chromexcel jacket I rolled it up and sat on it in the beginning to soften it up a bit. No shrinking at all. And Schitzo's jacket was from the tumbled FQHH, wasn't it? If there was shrinking it should have occurred before by all the tumbling and not by putting it in a suitcase.
     
  17. pawineguy

    pawineguy One Too Many

    Messages:
    1,974
    Location:
    Bucks County, PA
    What has Horween had to say?
     
  18. cordwangler

    cordwangler One of the Regulars

    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    UK

    come on, chaps, it's only some clothes!

    <can't find a suitable 'Handbags' GIF>
     
  19. Fanch

    Fanch I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    4,490
    Location:
    Texas
    On the other hand viewing this thread has been my best entertainment of the month! lol
     
  20. ProteinNerd

    ProteinNerd My Mail is Forwarded Here

    Messages:
    3,782
    Location:
    Sydney
    Just throwing this out there. From what I remember, you said the leather was quite different to other FQHH you had seen. I have no idea of Horweens processes but is it possible this hide came from a partially vegetable tanned batch by mistake? Throw in very high humidity and that might be cause for a little shrinkage?

    Personally, by now, I would have:
    1. Contacted Horween directly and asked them
    2. Driven to Scotland and shown them first hand. Its only an 8 hour drive...I did it a heap of times when I lived in London.

    Its obviously still bothering you enough to keep posting about it. Life is too short to waste on jackets that don't fit the way you want.

    Unless of course you are living up to the stereotype that an Englishman isn't happy unless he has something to complain about :eeek:lol
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.