Established in 1913, the family brand has known how to pass through the ages without taking a wrinkle. Marlon Brando or The Ramones have worn it and present the perfecto, emblem of the American culture and stamped with a decidedly rock'n roll spirit. Constantly renewed Schott collections retain the brand's DNA and in particular the robustness and functionality of its clothes.
I really do not want to bash the jacket for what it is, but continuing the discussion about the Schott name - why do this? The jacket is not made by Schott, is not made in USA and is not made with materials from Schott. So you only use the name without anything that constitutes the name Schott. Why cheapen your brand like that? Only for the monies?