To be fair, the article does not indicate that the book has anything disparaging at all to say about FLW, and in fact the article (if not the book) defends some engaging examples of modern architecture. Also, Libeskind and Gehry are outsdie the purview of the book and article as they are something past/beyond modern... post-post-modern I guess.
I think the buildings under scrutiny are the typical example of madernism in the intenational style, the kind of building that looks like a big concrete and/or glass filing cabinet. Like this simply hideous pile of dun-coloured concrete here in my own severely unlovely homebase:
I think the buildings under scrutiny are the typical example of madernism in the intenational style, the kind of building that looks like a big concrete and/or glass filing cabinet. Like this simply hideous pile of dun-coloured concrete here in my own severely unlovely homebase: