Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The general decline in standards today

Status
Not open for further replies.

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,114
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
What's interesting is how the Standard behemoth has been steadily reassembling itself over the last hundred years -- from 11 Standard companies marketing in defined territories in 1911, there are now three. So much for competition.
 
What's interesting is how the Standard behemoth has been steadily reassembling itself over the last hundred years -- from 11 Standard companies marketing in defined territories in 1911, there are now three. So much for competition.

That always happens when a company is broken up. Eventually it becomes one again. Bell will eventually become one again as well. Too much duplication of service just makes it happen.
 

rjb1

Practically Family
Messages
561
Location
Nashville
"What's interesting is how the Standard behemoth has been steadily reassembling itself over the last hundred years"
"That always happens when a company is broken up. Eventually it becomes one again."

Does this remind anyone of a corporate version of the second "Terminator"? The silver-guy just kept putting himself back together...
 
What's interesting is how the Standard behemoth has been steadily reassembling itself over the last hundred years -- from 11 Standard companies marketing in defined territories in 1911, there are now three. So much for competition.

Well, it's not quite that bad. There are three companies that have rights to the Standard name, but companies broken out of Standard in 1911 are now parts of ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, Shell, Marathon and Sunoco. Still, like AT&T and the "baby bells", they've slowly reattached themselves to each other, at least in part. What these companies don't have, however, is the stranglehold on pipelines, shipping, railroads, etc that Standard had. Furthermore, since the formation of OPEC in 1960, oil companies have almost no say-so in the price, both of which were the government's biggest gripes with Standard.
 
Well, it's not quite that bad. There are three companies that have rights to the Standard name, but companies broken out of Standard in 1911 are now parts of ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, Shell, Marathon and Sunoco. Still, like AT&T and the "baby bells", they've slowly reattached themselves to each other, at least in part. What these companies don't have, however, is the stranglehold on pipelines, shipping, railroads, etc that Standard had. Furthermore, since the formation of OPEC in 1960, oil companies have almost no say-so in the price, both of which were the government's biggest gripes with Standard.

So they traded Standard Oil price controls which were in this country and subject to our laws with oil price controls outside our country with no ability to change them and not subject to our laws. Great job...:eusa_doh::rolleyes:

You know, of course that Rockefeller controlled the pipelines because he built them all right? This was in response to the railroads which had formed a compact against him to force him to pay their transportation rates. He went around them and screwed them instead of them screwing him. :p
 
So they traded Standard Oil price controls which were in this country and subject to our laws with oil price controls outside our country with no ability to change them and not subject to our laws. Great job...:eusa_doh::rolleyes:

They didn't "trade" anything. By 1960, oil was discovered all over the world and American companies simply didn't control the market anymore. This would have happened whether Standard broke up or not.

You know, of course that Rockefeller controlled the pipelines because he built them all right? This was in response to the railroads which had formed a compact against him to force him to pay their transportation rates. He went around them and screwed them instead of them screwing him. :p

And this is the essence of anti-trust regulation.
 
They didn't "trade" anything. By 1960, oil was discovered all over the world and American companies simply didn't control the market anymore. This would have happened whether Standard broke up or not.



And this is the essence of anti-trust regulation.

They didn't know they were trading at the time but that is what they did. You really think Rockefeller would not have been global if Standard was not broken up?! You obviously do not realize how ambitious he was. lol lol

Rockefeller didn't need anti trust regulation---he just went around the railroad trusts. lol lol
 
Not in "today's dollars". Rockefeller was worth nearly $1 trillion in current dollars, Morgan 1/10th that.

I don't know where you get a trillion. In inflation adjusted dollars, Celebrity net worth rates Rockefeller at 340 billion when he died in 1937. Carnegie was rated at 310 billion---he got this from JP Morgan when he sold Carnegie Steel to him. Figuring that into JP Morgan's net worth you have far more money than either Rockefeller or Carnegie. You have to remember that JP Morgan was the inventor of our modern banking system. If he didn't have a ton of money---he could get it. :p
 
I don't know where you get a trillion. In inflation adjusted dollars, Celebrity net worth rates Rockefeller at 340 billion when he died in 1937. Carnegie was rated at 310 billion---he got this from JP Morgan when he sold Carnegie Steel to him. Figuring that into JP Morgan's net worth you have far more money than either Rockefeller or Carnegie. You have to remember that JP Morgan was the inventor of our modern banking system. If he didn't have a ton of money---he could get it. :p

Most estimates of Rockefeller's fortune are around $900+billion. Morgan didn't even have as much as Carnegie and combined they didn't have as much as Rockefeller.

Rockefeller had a billion dollars, back when a billion dollars actually meant something.
 
Last edited:
Most estimates of Rockefeller's fortune are around $900+billion. Morgan didn't even have as much as Carnegie and combined they didn't have as much as Rockefeller.

Rockefeller had a billion dollars, back when a billion dollars actually meant something.

That was a billion back then. Now about 340 Billion.

JP Morgan was different than the other two in the sense that he was born rich so he knew how to live it. Morgan had more money wrapped up in art, yachts and a bunch of other concerns that never get to the bottom line because they are sort of intangible---and were much more so than today. He definitely had more power than the other two. When you wonder who ran the government back in those days---you know a large part of it ran back to JP Morgan. Ever wonder why they broke up Standard Oil but left JP Morgan's assets alone? Rockefeller did. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
107,445
Messages
3,037,135
Members
52,840
Latest member
Vladyslav
Top