Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Throwaway History

thunderw21

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,044
Location
Iowa
Throwaway History
When History Meets Consumerism, History Loses
By Will M.

It was over 100 degrees in the middle of Iowa that late July day two summers ago. The sky was clear and the sun beat down but I didn't really notice while I was under the massive trees of the courthouse lawn. Like an authentic World War Two reenactor, I was wearing wools and profusely drinking from two canteens weighed down with water in a successful attempt to stay hydrated. I felt sorry for the American Civil War reenactors who had only one canteen per man and had been running drill all morning.

I was the only World War Two reenactor on the scene; a WW2 GI group was scheduled to arrive and take part in the ceremony but the heat scared them away. I was an anachronism at a purely 19th century affair.

My hometown was celebrating the founding GAR, or Grand Army of the Republic Association. Reenactors representing American soldiers from all periods had been invited to take part in the living history display, though only a dozen Civil War reenactors and myself showed along with a private military vehicle owner. Even so, the display was accurate and overwhelming. Several Civil War era tents dotted the lawn along with weapons and equipment spread out on blue blankets. A full-size replica cannon stood guard on the perimeter, booming at unseen enemies every so often. Passersby performed doubletakes and gazed in shock to see a small antiquated army marching and resting within the city limits. Some even stopped and wandered the camp, asking questions and handling equipment and even firearms with the owners intently watching close by.

But the turnout was disappointing. The pathetic 30 chairs set up for the official ceremony were more than enough for the small crowd of roughly a dozen in a town of 12,000. The organizers mostly blamed the heat for the lackluster interest in the historical anomaly. Yet the occasion was doomed to mediocrity before the heat wave had begun, before the event had even been announced in the local newspaper the week before. Unfortunately for us the GAR ceremony was scheduled on the same day as the so called "Crazy Days" when the downtown vendors hold special sales on the sidewalk under the bright summer sun. Hundreds if not thousands showed up to browse the sale goods while merely a dozen came to remember those who served in the Union, many being their very own ancestors.

After the courthouse ceremony what was described as a parade in the newspaper (actually a small convoy of three vehicles led by a National Guard HUMVEE) snaked along a predetermined and publicly announced route, meeting only five bystanders before rolling into the peaceful cemetary for the final event of the day and, unknown to the participants and organizers alike, the last event of what was meant to be a two-day celebration. After listening to a reading of the names of those from the county who had served in the Civil War, including a rebel along with the man who built my house where I know type this, the reenactors loaded up onto the air conditioned bus and headed back to the courthouse. Sitting next to a plump Union man with my M1 rifle resting vertically between my legs, I spoke with and listened to the others around me who were just as disappointed if not more so at the turn out or lack thereof, some having driven an hour to take part in the barely viewed event.

"You know, those folks at Crazy Days are so damn interested in buying crap they'll throw away within a week that they willingly missed remembering their own history" bellowed the reenactor organizer, dressed in an elegant officer's blouse and sporting an impeccably trimmed moustache. The other reenactors, including myself nodded and babbled in agreement. "You remember several years ago at Pufferbilly Days (another local celebration commemorating the town's railroad heritage) when they dumped us in favor of expanding the beer tent? They haven't had us back since. Follow the dollar and you'll find the snakes in the grass".

The lack of historical awareness in my hometown is probably an extreme case of uncaring. Recent trends show that historical museums, reenactments and publications are on the rise. Books and pamphlets dealing with history in one way or another often top best selling lists. Yet history today is becoming a consumerist item: history for the sake of making a buck. While people are generally still very interested in history they must jump through the hoops of commercialism to obtain what they seek and often it is watered down.

As David Roberts points out in his book In Search of the Old Ones national historical sites like Mesa Verde National Park, famous for its impressive Anasazi ruins, are becoming more like hokey tourist traps made to make a profit rather than places of real information and education. Roberts illustrates this point by recounting a recent trip to Mesa Verde where he watched supposed expert park rangers quickly herd groups of tourists through sites where, at times, they recite incorrect and cliche information and call Richard Wetherill, the discoverer of Mesa Verde and arguably the father of modern North American archeological technique a "vandal" and "pothunting cowboy". No longer can those obsessed with the Anasazi linger at these breathtaking sites; no longer can one gaze and wonder at ancient fingerprints pressed into the prehistoric mortar of Cliff Palace or most of the other 600 ruins. At only one major site, Spruce Tree House, are visiters able to loiter around the sterile and partially reconstructed ruins left by a mysterious and rather sophisticated civilization. Even the museums at Mesa Verde are void of any real information, the artifacts on display having been removed from their context and all information being regurgitated so visitors can easily understand without having go through any real thought process. Skeletons and mummys once on display are now hidden away in storage rooms out of political correctness and cultural sensitivity. The plight of Mesa Verde, where everything is prepackaged and real history is being scaled back in favor of more snack bars and gift shops, is being multiplied by other historical sites and events across the country.

Yet who can blame them for becoming commercialized when most everything else in society is already? 43 years ago Charles Schulz warned us about the growing trend of commercialism and consumerism with "A Charlie Brown Christmas". And while we reminiscently watch Schulz's innocent cartoon every Christmas we unwittingly fall into the very thing about which it warns us. Our economy is now built upon a shaky and crumbling foundation of buying what we cannot afford with money we do not have. Yet it is a double-edged sword: the consumerism that is destroying us allows us in part to remain relatively free and live exceedingly comfortable lives, thereby continuing our need for consumerism. As Yossarian observed, "That's some catch..." So why not consumerist history for a consumerist people? Anything else would just be too difficult and worthwhile.
Sitting on the bus, having exhausted our once raucous conversation against 'those people', we reenactors made our way back in air conditioned comfort. I removed the hot and heavy M1 helmet from my damp head and unstrapped my sweat-stained haversack, sighing with relief. Then it hit me. Was I part of 'those people' we had so viciously berated? For one, as a reenactor I put on a historical show for those willing enough to come and watch. In mock battles we shoot real guns but fake bullets at one another and die with our boots on, invisible blood pouring from our makebelieve wounds, all for the sake of 'informing' an easily entertained crowd.

Hanging my head with disdain for the state of affairs, I mourned our history's future and quietly muttered under my breath.

"That's some catch."
 

JEEP

Practically Family
Messages
704
Location
Horsens, Denmark
Amen!

Being a student of archaeology and a re-enactor myself I can fully relate to your writings above.

Even here in Denmark, known to be a country with a great deal of historical awareness among it's people (even our queen is an amateur archaeologist), things are looking bad - and museums and re-enactment fairs are becoming more and more like theme-parks, being more about entertainment than education.


High regards.

Jakob
 
Unfortunately i find little to agree with here (original post). I won't take these things point by point - it would take me all day - but will agree to disagree.

In general i agree, however, that the state of history education is in dire straits. Informative books should be available; there's no doubt about that. The problem is the proliferation of crap. Bestseller. Schmoltzy "popular" history. Tug at the heart-strings "weren't women/men/blacks/chinese/whites/name-your-interest-group-here hard done by back then; ain't it so great now!"-type history. The kind of "history" books that mangle the past in order to promote a specific thesis (see Antonia fraser et al. who have reduced Henry VIII in the public's image to no more than a blaring mysoginist. Really, people, henry VIIIs wives are very very unimportant historically, when compared to his achievements.)

oh well, life goes on, and people will continue their obsession with being "entertained".

bk
 

Brad Bowers

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,187
Baron Kurtz said:
Tug at the heart-strings "weren't women/men/blacks/chinese/whites/name-your-interest-group-here hard done by back then; ain't it so great now!"-type history.

During my MA in History program, I argued this very point in my seminars, and subsequently became a pariah. No one believed me when I said history is all about economics, from personal to national. How dare I say something disparaging about gender/race/sex studies! How just like a white guy.lol

Brad
 

Twitch

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,133
Location
City of the Angels
The part about Mesa verde hit a chord. On another thread we have people po-pooing TV but the most up to date insights of the Anasazi I've seen have come from documentaries from the dreaded educational channels.

1 minor example- that they were eco-aware when in fact they hacked down trees at will farther and farther away till the nearest wood was many miles away. :eusa_doh: D'oh! is right!

In paleoarcheology and allied fields of nearly any science or tangible items the entrenched academia have oft times built their entire reputations on one fact, bone or other such evidence. When new finds are unearthed and different explanations applied these people have been known to literally shout down the upstarts in universities all over.

They don't want to hear anything that could rock their boat of publishing papers and having tenure and becoming department heads. Due to simple vanity these people have historically founght tooth and nail any diverent theory to just about anything! It usually takes years and additional finds and an overwhelming number of students of the new theory to banish the bullcrap of status quo.

The myriad subjects that hold true mystery in the world should be seriously pursued to conclusive study yet we usually see nothing more than packaged-for-TV (meaning advertisers) docutainment. These at least spur those with interest to study further. For the amount of money spent on production of fluff shows like this an actual in-the-field expeditiary force could be funded to delve into unanswered questions to many subjects.

Yet alas, I cannot agree that reinactments or any pure entertainment form, frivilous as it may be, is completely worthless. There are those persons that will be stimulated by the fiction of history to explore further. If a phoney Civil War battle done for the zillionth time catches the imagination of someone to make the factual history of the era their hobby or main interest that is a good thing.;)
 

thunderw21

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,044
Location
Iowa
Good points all.

Twitch, you are right when you say that reenacting is not merely for entertainment, otherwise I would not do it. Reenacting has its place. It can inspire a younger generation to take an interest in history.

However, there are places where it can go wrong. For one, FARBY reenactors who are not willing to change their 'unauthentic' impression or ways not only hurt the hobby but also disrespect those they are meant to portray. Unfortunately after "Saving Private Ryan" and "Band of Brothers" a large number of reenactors, both new and old, began portraying Rangers and Airborne, perhaps even outnumbering Leg reenactors. It was the cool thing to do: wear jump boots, put extra pockets on your M42 jacket, wear a med kit on your helmet, portray a Pathfinder, etc. The reenactor's code is to portray a normal, everyday soldier rather than specialized individuals. We as reenactors have failed according to the reenactor's code.

And if we really think about it, it's a bit strange that a bunch of largely overweight men past their prime dress up in old uniforms, shoot blanks at each other and roll around in fields and forests while other people watch. Yet it happens, which shows us that people still do care. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against reenacting (being a reenactor myself) but I think we do history and those people from the past a diservice if we portray them poorly or dumb their lives down.

But I can't blame the people who are in the field. Some of the dumbing down is due to bureaucracy. However, most of it is due to the visitors and spectators themselves. I've been to Mesa Verde and heard the cliche and inaccurate park ranger speeches for myself; I've put displays together at a museum and I can tell you most people in those fields care about the history they are trying to teach but they can't get an audience unless they dumb down the history in order to compete with everything else in the world that grabs people's attention. Why would anyone want to go to a museum or reenactment when they could be playing their X-box 360, shopping, watching a movie or text messaging?
 

thunderw21

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,044
Location
Iowa
Baron Kurtz said:
In general i agree, however, that the state of history education is in dire straits. Informative books should be available; there's no doubt about that. The problem is the proliferation of crap. Bestseller. Schmoltzy "popular" history. Tug at the heart-strings "weren't women/men/blacks/chinese/whites/name-your-interest-group-here hard done by back then; ain't it so great now!"-type history. The kind of "history" books that mangle the past in order to promote a specific thesis (see Antonia fraser et al. who have reduced Henry VIII in the public's image to no more than a blaring mysoginist. Really, people, henry VIIIs wives are very very unimportant historically, when compared to his achievements.)

Agreed. 'Public history' has taken a turn for the worse, where parts of history are twisted to fulfill specific personal beliefs and desires while the rest is dumped by the wayside.
 

JEEP

Practically Family
Messages
704
Location
Horsens, Denmark
thunderw21 said:
However, there are places where it can go wrong. For one, FARBY reenactors who are not willing to change their 'unauthentic' impression or ways not only hurt the hobby but also disrespect those they are meant to portray. Unfortunately after "Saving Private Ryan" and "Band of Brothers" a large number of reenactors, both new and old, began portraying Rangers and Airborne, perhaps even outnumbering Leg reenactors. It was the cool thing to do: wear jump boots, put extra pockets on your M42 jacket, wear a med kit on your helmet, portray a Pathfinder, etc. The reenactor's code is to portray a normal, everyday soldier rather than specialized individuals. We as reenactors have failed according to the reenactor's code.

I know that problem all to well from the medieval re-enactment scene; for every peasant, common garrison soldier, trader, craftsman, monk there is at least two noblemen, knights, rich mercanaies, bishops, Jeanne D'Arcs, etc.

In my group we have made it a rule only to display common people og the time.


/Jakob
 

TheKitschGoth

A-List Customer
Messages
407
Location
Brighton, UK
thunderw21 said:
Agreed. 'Public history' has taken a turn for the worse, where parts of history are twisted to fulfill specific personal beliefs and desires while the rest is dumped by the wayside.

And it wasn't like that before?
 

Fletch

I'll Lock Up
Messages
8,865
Location
Iowa - The Land That Stuff Forgot
Too much local history, especially, is going the way of oral and family reminiscence and stopping there. Valuable as that is, it can never take the place of artifacts, newspapers, photos and the public record. Otherwise, all you're left with is a bunch of individuals looking back, rather than the collective experience of a place.
 

KilroyCD

One Too Many
Messages
1,966
Location
Lancaster County, PA
thunderw21 said:
I've put displays together at a museum and I can tell you most people in those fields care about the history they are trying to teach but they can't get an audience unless they dumb down the history in order to compete with everything else in the world that grabs people's attention. Why would anyone want to go to a museum or reenactment when they could be playing their X-box 360, shopping, watching a movie or text messaging?
I agree. Case in point, our Civilian Defense living history group puts on an incendiary bomb fighting demo at some events. I have a real (inert) WWII German 1kg incendiary that I use as an educational tool, and we use a dummy replica with a smoke charge for the demo on how to fight these bombs. We get a small group (I cannot even call it a crowd) most of the time, sometimes nobody stops by. But when we had the performers who portray Abbott & Costello join in and it turned into a 'schtick" routine, did we ever get a crowd! It's sad, but sometimes to get people to pay attention you have to entertain them. I'm not against entertaining the public, but the key is to find the right balance. If you can teach the public about history, yet entertain them at the same time, it's not such a bad thing.
 
Re: ancient sites.

I think you describe a real problem in terms of ill-informed "guides" at the site you describe. part of the problem is that people are not safe to be allowed to roam these sites without guards. They steal, they litter, they destroy. Too many sites have already been destroyed by selfish oafs, and the authorities are rightfully weary of this. Hence the herding.

bk
 

Paisley

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,439
Location
Indianapolis
People wouldn't necessarily have turned out to a historical event if there weren't a sale going on. I myself avoid going anywhere in 100 degree heat...except to someplace air conditioned.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
108,940
Messages
3,071,132
Members
54,003
Latest member
brendastoner
Top