Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

List of classic manufacturer's . . .

Marc Chevalier

Gone Home
Messages
18,192
Location
Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California
RedPop4 said:
Our society is still reaping the crop of 1968.

Ironically, San Francisco's 'first' psychedelic band, THE CHARLATANS, always wore authentic vintage (Edwardian) suits, waistcoats, stiff-collared shirts, ties and hats during their performances. The group formed in 1965; it pretty much disbanded in '68. Coincidence?


CAH660108-HB.jpg
 

feltfan

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,190
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
RedPop4 said:
Good call, Mingoslim. Our society is still reaping the crop of 1968.

As I have pointed before (here: http://www.thefedoralounge.com/showthread.php?t=14611 ),
the hippies wore hats. It was the "establishment" that
stopped wearing hats.

Hippies are easy targets, but it's simply not an accurate assessment.

And as we know, hat wearing began its decline before World War II.
 

Dinerman

Super Moderator
Bartender
Messages
10,562
Location
Bozeman, MT
besdor said:
I think that Morefelt was not a company name but a type of hat made by a company. It was made of a wool/fur blend that today is called Dynafelt or Furlite by Bailey
Steven
www.bencraft.com

The '40's/ '50's porkpie I saw said "Morfelt Hat Company" on the liner and on the sweatband. There was no other company marking; I believe there was a model name marked on the sweat as well, but I don't recall what it was called. The one I recently sold said morfelt est. 1879? on it ( I don't have the hat any longer, and I can't tell from the picture what the last two digits of the date are) on the liner.
 

Mr Maltby

One of the Regulars
Messages
139
Location
Santa Barbara, Ca
Fedoras, 1961-1968

This is all in fun, mind you, I harbor no ill will, but I still most cordially disagree. No hippes here. All Americana.

1961:
1961.jpg


1962:
1962.jpg


1963:
1963.jpg


1964:
1964.jpg


1964(again):
1964-02.jpg


1965:
1965.jpg


1966:
1966.jpg


1968:
1968.jpg
 

mingoslim

Practically Family
Messages
858
Location
Southern Ohio
The list just keeps expanding . . .

I currently have about 90 companies on the list . . .
What I need now is more detailed information on the companies, their products, when they were in business, etc. etc. etc.
 

feltfan

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,190
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Mr Maltby said:
This is all in fun, mind you, I harbor no ill will, but I still most cordially disagree. No hippes here. All Americana.

:eek:fftopic: Those are ads, not sales. As we know, they didn't sell.
That's why we find ourselves where we are today.

Of course the irony is that it wasn't hippies or executives.
If we're to be honest, the majority of white men stopped wearing hats.
Hippies and minorities continued to wear them, but did not
constitute a big enough market.

Perhaps those ads should have had hippies, blacks, and asians
in them, if they wanted to sell hats. /:eek:fftopic:

Getting back on topic, Hat Company of America also sold
hats under their own name (I have one), so that should be
on the list as a separate entity.
 

Mr Maltby

One of the Regulars
Messages
139
Location
Santa Barbara, Ca
Last I checked, Frank Sinatra, and Schlitz werent exactly doing too awfully. Nor were they too terribly counter culture. But Im glad you throw "blacks" and "asians" around like that. Apparently your social candor stopped mid 50's as well. I think talk like -that- is always off topic, regardless of the thread. Yes, I agree, back on topic.
 

feltfan

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,190
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Mr Maltby said:
But Im glad you throw "blacks" and "asians" around like that. Apparently your social candor stopped mid 50's as well. I think talk like -that- is always off topic, regardless of the thread. Yes, I agree, back on topic.

Whoa, wait a moment. What happened to,
"This is all in fun, mind you, I harbor no ill will"?

What exactly is wrong with what I said? How would
you have said it? There is nothing wrong with those terms,
terms that I might add were not in use in the 1950s. Nothing
I said was derrogatory or inappropriate. Quite the contrary.
I have no idea how you're reading what into what I wrote,
but I do wish you'd come out and state your opinion rather than make
a nebulous negative inference.

My apologies to all for going off topic, but I hope you understand
that's a heck of an accusation to ignore. Bartenders, feel free to
remove this post, but only if you remove Mr. Maltby's accusation as well.
 
Messages
10,620
Location
My mother's basement
Back on topic

Don't forget that other Stetson -- Steven Stetson, I think it was (of New York? is that right?), as distinguished from the John B. Stetson Co., late of Philadelphia, PA and St. Joe, MO, but now of Garland, Texas, where the cardboard comes from.
 

mingoslim

Practically Family
Messages
858
Location
Southern Ohio
I owned a Stetson by the "other" guy . . .

tonyb said:
Don't forget that other Stetson -- Steven Stetson, I think it was (of New York? is that right?), as distinguished from the John B. Stetson Co., late of Philadelphia, PA and St. Joe, MO, but now of Garland, Texas, where the cardboard comes from.

I actually owned an Stetson of NYC a few years back and thought it was a pretty good hat . . . But I sacrificed it to the Gods of eBay . . . As I remember, it brought a fair price also.
 

Brad Bowers

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,187
feltfan said:
Ideally such a list would distinguish between companies
that made their own felt and those that used felt from
commercial felt makers, a timeline for when companies
became part of Hatco (at one point Mallory, Knox, Dobbs,
Cavanagh, and Stetson were all the same company), and
a distinction between hat makers (e.g., the Stetson of old)
and hat sellers who don't really make their own hats
(e.g., today's Lock hats). But that's ambitious.

Consolidation started before the 1920s, leading me to believe that the hat industry was one of the "Sick Industries" that preceded the Great Depression. After all, sales were sliding since 1903!

Most of this is from Debbie Henderson's fine book:

Knox and Dunlap joined forces in 1918. At some point, (I don't know when), they were bought out by Byer-Rolnick (Resistol). Byer-Rolnick formed in 1927 and were eventually themselves bought by Hatco in the 1960s.

Stetson was in Philly.

Norwalk, CT, was where the high end hatters were located: Knox, Crofut & Knapp, Dobbs, Cavanagh...

Danbury, CT, was the other hat-making center, with Mallory and Lee (probably the most prolific producer of hats for private labeling).

Dobbs and Cavanagh formed Cavanagh-Dobbs in 1928. They added Crofut & Knapp to the fold sometime between March and June 1929. Hat Corporation of America took over in 1932.

Brad
 

Fletch

I'll Lock Up
Messages
8,865
Location
Iowa - The Land That Stuff Forgot
Dunbury, CT, is actually Danbury.
There's still a passenger car on the Metro-North RR named The Danbury Hatter.

Has anybody mentioned Selco yet? Supposedly traceable to 1799 and the Italian (later Czech!) firm of Selentino, my 1940s-early 50s models carry the date "1898" and addresses in Brooklyn. There's still a Selco store there, but I know nothing of any factory connected with it or the 1898 firm.

There's also the Lamson-Hubbard Co. of Boston, of whom I learned only last night.
389534547_a83ce58a4a.jpg
 

Fletch

I'll Lock Up
Messages
8,865
Location
Iowa - The Land That Stuff Forgot
nulty said:
Originally Posted by RedPop4
Good call, Mingoslim. Our society is still reaping the crop of 1968.

And what a good crop it was that year.......:eek:

sorry..had to

as you were
Apropos of '68, here's Gene McCarthy bareheaded and Hubert Humphrey homburg'd.
Liebling_McCarthy%20web%20image.jpg

U of Minnesota home game, 1958 (sic).
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,357
Messages
3,035,095
Members
52,793
Latest member
ivan24
Top