The social hierarchy of hat styles

Discussion in 'Hats' started by Blackthorn, Feb 15, 2020 at 12:07 AM.

  1. Blackthorn

    Blackthorn I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    4,175
    Location:
    Oroville
    I’ve been musing about this subject for a long time, so now it’s time to give it a viewing here.


    At the top we have, of course, the top hat, appropriately named. Top hats are for the elite whether of actual royalty or just the wealthy men, to wear at gala events or wherever they may want to wear them. I’m reminded of the various versions of Dickens’ Christmas Carol and how the rich financiers and investors are wearing their toppers. Or there’s the famous picture of JFK wearing his top hat and tuxedo…American royalty.


    The next layer down are the homburgs, the lids worn by university professors or intellectuals of all kinds on a daily basis when they aren’t wearing their top hats to a formal event. Homburgs have a more European flavor. We don’t see them often in the U.S.


    Next layer down the chain are the fedoras, worn in “the golden age” by average businessmen or even many tradesmen who could afford them. I have a picture of my dad wearing one in 1942 as he awaited his draft notice. He had been a farmworker all his life, but when he could finally put some money together and get a fedora, he felt like he had hit the big time. Now he could stop looking like a hillbilly (his words, not mine). He was very proud to be seen in it when he drove into town after a hard day in the cotton fields. After he got back from the War, he wore it in his new trade of carpentry. Gangsters, detectives, newspaper reporters, insurance salesmen—they all wore fedoras.


    At the bottom of the list is the flat cap…newsboy, ivy, apple jack…whatever name works for the part of the globe where the wearer finds himself. They were and are worn by newspaper sellers, shoeshine men, taxi drivers, dock workers, gardeners, horse grooms. I take pride in wearing them as I think of myself as being of solid peasant stock. Cap wearers couldn’t afford any of the styles listed above. The caps were made of wool or cotton and thus were much more affordable.


    I’m reminded of Schindler’s List where the Nazis are sorting out those who can be used by the Third Reich and those who can’t. One Nazi screener is interviewing a Jewish university professor (who is wearing a fedora), and the professor is saying, “What do you mean teaching history isn’t important to society?” Ben Kingsley’s character jerks the guy out of line and in the next scene the same character is back, wearing a flat cap and saying, “I’m a metal polisher.” I can’t think of a more profound example of what a difference in social class can be shown by hat styles.


    The only thing that doesn’t fit these general rules, as I see them, are golfers who wear flat caps. It takes money to play golf, but frequently they wear the flat caps…it doesn’t compute, but there you have it.


    Cowboy hats, straw hats for farmworkers, baseball caps…all are deserving of a post for another day.


    Your mileage may vary. I expect it will. :)
     
    DOGMAN, Bamaboots, hatsRme and 4 others like this.
  2. deadlyhandsome

    deadlyhandsome I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    8,305
    Location:
    Central California

    My mileage does indeed vary. A working class man might only have one or perhaps two hats, but the wealthy had many more. Royalty don’t wear top hats out for a day of shooting. A dinner with friends where a dinner suit/jacket is worn calls for a black homburg and not a top hat (although this wasn’t the case before the Edwardian era). The lord of the manner might be in a wool cap or a soft felt (fedora etc.) depending on the venue, activity, time of day, etc. Bankers, prime ministers, lords, and near-do-wells matched their accessories to the activity much more than they do today. In Victorian times it wasn’t uncommon for the prosperous working class to wear toppers. And it was royalty that popularized the homburg. I believe it’s wrong to say that a style or type of hat belong to one social class or a group of occupations. Gangsters were seen in fedoras because at that time (and in Hollywood’s depictions) men had mostly moved from hard felt to soft felt. Similar correlations, as opposed to causations, are present for the other groups too.

    Today, for good and ill, we don’t have the highly structured social norms for dress. Billionaires are seen in public in ripped jeans and tee-shirts. It’s rare that we ever “dress for dinner,” and I’ve grown to like a homburg with a polo shirt. It’s a brave new world. :)
     
    DOGMAN, Dlaniger, Rmccamey and 3 others like this.
  3. SteveFord

    SteveFord One of the Regulars

    Messages:
    164
    What about the mighty bowler? Worn by everyone from the horsey set to working stiffs to famous comedians to the swave and deboner people like the fine folks here.
     
    DOGMAN, Rmccamey and Blackthorn like this.
  4. Frunobulax

    Frunobulax

    Messages:
    14,319
    Location:
    Funkytown, USA
    I think the social stratification based on hat style is interesting; however, I think it's a secondary factor.

    Hats were and are functional items. So a hat choice was often a choice based on profession (Westerns, Newsboys, Homburgs for bankers, etc.). The social class is defined by the profession. The hat is/was an indicator.

    Even within subgroups. Cowboys wear Westerns, the Trail Boss wears an Open Road.

    And Steve is right. At one time, the bowler was ubiquitous.
     
  5. Blackthorn

    Blackthorn I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    4,175
    Location:
    Oroville
    I totally forgot the bowler, but I think it transcends social status, as opposed to my point in posting about hat styles reflecting lifestyles. :) And I knew there'd be disagreement. That's okay. :)
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2020 at 8:14 PM
    DOGMAN, SteveFord and deadlyhandsome like this.
  6. johnnycanuck

    johnnycanuck Call Me a Cab

    Messages:
    2,117
    Location:
    Alberta
    What about the bowler? Won’t somebody think about the bowler!
    ;)
    Johnny
     
    Blackthorn, Rmccamey and SteveFord like this.
  7. deadlyhandsome

    deadlyhandsome I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    8,305
    Location:
    Central California
    Always room for gentlemanly disagreement. I do agree that certain hat styles are more closely associated with certain groups. However, I don’t think the breakdown follows professions or even strictly follows socioeconomic status. The King of England wore a top hat, Homburg, wool cap, etc. all within the course of a day. I think we can say that the headwear was more event/setting/time of day driven. Kennedy occasionally wore a fedora (Cavanagh I believe) and rarely wore a top hat. Churchill was a homburg man, but he wore a top hat at formal occasions. I just think there are too many data points that don’t fit to support your supposition.
     
    Blare, Rmccamey and Blackthorn like this.
  8. belfastboy

    belfastboy My Mail is Forwarded Here

    Messages:
    3,568
    Location:
    vancouver, canada
    I think an important piece of info is the 'why' of hat wearing. Hats were, back in the day, a practical more than a fashion statement for most as it kept the airborne dust and dirt out of one's hair. Shampoo is a relatively modern invention and the washing of hair daily a boomer generation conceit.

    The good news is that we don't have to wear hats any longer for that purpose as our air quality is so much better in modern times than it was even in our parent's generation. I remember London in the 1960's and returning home from a day out and about, wiping my brow with a white towel revealed an alarming amount of black soot on the towel.....residue from the dirty diesel being burnt in cars and the coal for heating houses.
     
    Blackthorn likes this.
  9. GHT

    GHT I'll Lock Up

    Messages:
    6,343
    Location:
    New Forest
    Giving status to a hat, albeit unwritten, means that hats describe both the pecking order and the station in life that goes with it. Much the same can be said of accents and jobs. In the UK the garbage collector is known as The Dustman. When giving an example of extremes it was quite common to say, "From a Lord to a dustman," The Lord being topdog and the dustman the underdog.

    Hats do have a system of prestige but there is the scenario of working class head wear, like the cloth cap, being worn by nobility; at game bird shoots for example. Does the Lord like to display his working class credentials, or is it a case of inverted snobbery? Personally I'm with the, "if the hat fits, wear it sort." So if the Lord of the manor wears a flat cap, he won't mind if the dustmen wear something a little more prestigious.
    dustmen2.jpg dustmen1.jpg
     
    Blare, DOGMAN, BobHufford and 6 others like this.
  10. Rmccamey

    Rmccamey Call Me a Cab

    Messages:
    2,139
    Location:
    Central Texas
    The OP was written from a decidedly western and 19th and 20th century perspective. Many, many hat styles have been left out of the discussion thus far. Even if a date range and place were specified, I doubt there would be anything other than a very weak, and probably random, correlation between hat style and social status. There might be some correlation between hat price and social status, but I suspect that would be very weak as well.


     
    deadlyhandsome, steur and Blackthorn like this.
  11. johnnycanuck

    johnnycanuck Call Me a Cab

    Messages:
    2,117
    Location:
    Alberta
    Time and location makes more of a difference. Here is an English law

    One such law, the Statute of Apparel, passed in 1571, specifically stated that all English citizens above the age of six, except nobility, "had on Sabbath and Holydays to wear caps of woolmanufactured in England.

    so if you were a working class stiff and needed a hat you would probably just buy a wool flat cap so you won’t get in trouble for wearing the wrong hat on your day off. I know my Grandfather, a Scottish farmer then grounds keeper, wore one every day of his life.

    The bowler started as a labourers hat but by the 1960’s London if you had certain office job it was mandatory you wore one to work every day. (Found this out from an older gentleman I met that worked in London as an accountant)

    fun hat information.
    Johnny
     
    Rmccamey, Blackthorn and BobHufford like this.
  12. SteveFord

    SteveFord One of the Regulars

    Messages:
    164
    I guess if they MADE you wear a hat every day that would tend to put you off them.
    Nobody is making me wear a homburg so I wore one today to try and class up the neighborhood a little.
     
    Zombie_61, Rmccamey and Blackthorn like this.
  13. johnnycanuck

    johnnycanuck Call Me a Cab

    Messages:
    2,117
    Location:
    Alberta
    There was also a mentality that if you always wore your hat, you would never catch a cold. Heard both my grandfathers say that a few times. That was in the 1980’s. So there was that as well.
    Johnny
     
    Zombie_61, Rmccamey and Blackthorn like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.