Hey Yahoody, good seeing you. Interesting video too.
Love the Appys. Looking good.Thanks! Been out of the loop for a bit. Did get out this weekend to show off the horse a bit
Hey Yahoody. Just wanted to post this photo, although it isn't a very good one. This was me in 1973 at 14. The last horse I owned. Not as leggy as your horse but a good little mare.Thanks! Been out of the loop. But did get out this weekend to show off the horse a bit
This is my BIG Little man. Big heart, Little horse by comparison @ 15h. They're all characters.
Oh wow, that is a beautiful horse. And at 16.3 hands the Big Un would be tall for an early fall wouldn't it. LOL I like the hats too.Nice photo! Thanks for sharing. You're looking mighty handy as a pair there Scott! My "big 'un" @ 16.3h is a show stopper but it is a long way down if you get off early. I have others that are shall we say..."more fun"
Little Horse knows the only rule here is, "Don't touch his hat".
What a cool collectible Jack.The Bulldogger.
I have one of these original movie posters/original frame of Bill Pickett. I think I have posted it in a hat pic before.
Ouch, hate that sellers don't take the time to accurately list their items.
They must not teach how to read a ruler or tape measure in school anymore.
You're probably right about that....but my guess would be that the internet, and most likely this forum, gave someone just enough information to be dangerous. Some of the older vintage hats only had the fraction listed on the tag...the 7 being implicit (I learned that here) thus the 58 (because Australia uses the metric system.... I did not learn that here) on the decidedly not modern looking size tag becomes 5/8 in the seller's mind's eye. No need to get out a tool and do any actual work when the information you need is printed right there on the tag.
And you may be totally correct but the Seller is a Russian living in Florida who said her "douther" didn't see the size tag or actually "meajure" anything.
Too funny.
Get used to it. It's all part of this new country of diversity we live in.
I got zero trouble with diversity. It keeps the gene pool from getting stagnant. My well wishes were in your dealings with a disingenuous seller. If the tag was not looked at nor "meajurements" made then I dont understand how the size could be identified, much less misidentified. Did they just pull a number out of their ass? I hope they're not so mathematically challenged when it comes to your refund.
Well here's a quote from the listing which I find interesting in light of todays reply:
