- Messages
- 10,614
Far as I am concerned jackets under a grand are not collectible they are wearables.
It's a language barrier. I was referring to the comment that a jacket with an unknown maker or replacement zip is of small value to a collector. My attitude is I am not buying vintage jackets as an investment I am buying them to wear and experience. Buying a higher price vintage jacket over one grand, for example, I am more concerned about a resale when I decide to move the jacket to make room so I can experience other vintage jackets.(1) what does price have to do with collectability?
All of my vintage jackets are worth far less than a grand but I'm sure I own a couple of pieces that leather jacket enthousiasts would love to add to their collection.
(2) If you consider jackets that are under a grand wearables, what are 1k+ jackets to you? Not for wearing?
I don't think people who buy a 1k+ Buco buy the jacket to hang it on the wall as a display piece. They buy it to wear it. That's why vintage jackets in larger sizes go for more money than a the ones that could fit a 12 year old kid.
Nice just a tease when this gems show up in small sizes
I was referring to the comment that a jacket with an unknown maker is of small value to a collector.
What kind of value are you referring to, market value? I consider myself a collector, personally I don't care about market value. Market value is driven by Rin Tanaca's book and all the repro makers who copy the designs featured in that book. Some of my best pieces don't have a maker's label. They're also not featured in the book. Their market value is probably lower than a Buco, but who cares. Not me. I care about the quality of a jacket, pattern materials and construction techniques.
Agreed. Currently established market value of certain leather jackets is completely baseless and driven exclusively by random turn of events, rather than based upon tangible factors such as quality of making, material or indeed, scarcity.
Henceforth we constantly "discover" what appear to be very high quality, "no name" jackets, listed at very low prices. Annex Apparel constructed what I believe is one of the finest leather jackets I have ever handled, yet despite the fact that anyone who had handled their product, readily agrees with my assessment, people'd still list it at $100-$150 because it is not a Buco. Nevermind the fact that Buco isn't 1/10th of AA quality.
Recently, I had received a several PM's by members who are utterly impressed with Harro jackets, having had to handle the jackets in order to understand what I've been talking about for years. Yes, they're that much better than Brooks. It's hard to even compare the two how superior Harro is.
Rin Tanaka's book did as much damage as good.
(1) what does price have to do with collectability?
All of my vintage jackets are worth far less than a grand but I'm sure I own a couple of pieces that leather jacket enthousiasts would love to add to their collection.
(2) If you consider jackets that are under a grand wearables, what are 1k+ jackets to you? Not for wearing?
I don't think people who buy a 1k+ Buco buy the jacket to hang it on the wall as a display piece. They buy it to wear it. That's why vintage jackets in larger sizes go for more money than a the ones that could fit a 12 year old kid.
It's a language barrier. I was referring to the comment that a jacket with an unknown maker or replacement zip is of small value to a collector. My attitude is I am not buying vintage jackets as an investment I am buying them to wear and experience. Buying a higher price vintage jacket over one grand, for example, I am more concerned about a resale when I decide to move the jacket to make room so I can experience other vintage jackets.
The most experienced and dedicated to historic jacket research I know is Terry who buys jackets that he can not wear. Terry is a collector and researcher.
I would buy it as goatskin. I have calf skin that looks similar, but is not often seen. The beautiful brown finish also says goat to me. As my album shows, goatskin jackets were often done in interesting shades of brown that you just don't see in other leathers of the time. The goatskin may be more responsive to colors.
I do see some finish wear on the upper arm pictured, but I don't see flaking and other forms of rot. I don't see the cracks in the collar.
Missing the original zipper is a negative. Most probably had a sunrise Talon zipper. Difficult zipper to find if you want to restore to the jacket.
View attachment 344842
It does appear to have this very limited Talon Olympic Ring Pull. These are seldom seen. The jacket below is from 1941. I would estimate this jacket to be in this time frame.
View attachment 344843
All in all a nice Vintage jacket. It would not be a daily wearer. Special occasions sounds right.
This Cal has relisted a couple times at $200 + shipping. Size 36L, or around that. Anyone know how difficult it would be to repair the seam issues in the arm?
Anytime a tailor has to open up the lining, that is sorta like open heart surgery for a jacket. Its among the most costly types of repairs (Usually, the most costly wear and tear type of repair is a full jacket re-line).
Anytime a tailor has to open up the lining, that is sorta like open heart surgery for a jacket. Its among the most costly types of repairs (Usually, the most costly wear and tear type of repair is a full jacket re-line). Now CAL may be able to do the repairs more efficiently to their own jackets---maybe they've got some tricks or maybe their jacket construction would allow for easier access to these seams. But in general, anytime you need to open up the lining to get into the repair, you're looking at a high cost repair.
Why do you think it's that costly?
I recently had these elastic bands fitted to keep the gussets in place. Obviously the lining had to be opened. I was told it was it was a 15 minute job start to finish.
View attachment 345109
View attachment 345107 View attachment 345108
Sounds to me your tailor's been exaggerating a bit there to inflate the price. XD
The repair on that Cal would actually be very simple and cheap & it's done through the sleeve.
In reality, most repairs on leather jackets are done through the sleeve and on some jackets there's even a seam on the sleeve lining that's deliberately stitched facing the... Outside, I don't know how to explain any better 'cause I'm not a tailor, with an intention of being easily accessed and closed afterwards. If I'm not mistaken, this is how you finish up stitching any jacket in general.
Anyway, I'm sure @regius can shed more light on this but what you'd do in general here is flip the jacket inside-out, open the sleeve lining & restitch the busted seam. Entire repair can be done by hand and you don't necessarily need a machine to do it as you can just follow the original stitch holes but it'd of course look nicer if you did it properly. I have repaired / reinforced seams on many of the jackets that I have had that way, if I noticed the seams coming undone - Which often was the case.