Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Messages
10,524
Location
DnD Ranch, Cherokee County, GA
Hmmm.

I thought water contracted the fibres ( over time ) and the use of steam - expand them. ( great advice for getting my akubra in the new year...can't wait! )

Steam will relax the shellac in the felt & as it cools will set the stiffness back. Just wetting will relax the shellac some but drying won't necessarily recharge the stiffness. A hat worn in the rain over time gets softer & softer but if you steam & shape it, it seems to return some of the stiffness. JMHO
 

Gumbo Book

Familiar Face
Messages
96
Location
Staffordshire U.K.
Steam will relax the shellac in the felt & as it cools will set the stiffness back. Just wetting will relax the shellac some but drying won't necessarily recharge the stiffness. A hat worn in the rain over time gets softer & softer but if you steam & shape it, it seems to return some of the stiffness. JMHO

I thought so. Thanks. I am experimenting in the new year with some felt bodies and want to get it right. ( As for as the supplier tells me it's heavy weight 220g ) So I'll just have to make mistake after mistake. I also want to avoide shrinkage - I've read shrinkage is due the amount of air pockets in the felt that contract. Less obvious in the brim but more noticable in the crown.

I have vintage hats. And believe me, I have been caught not just in rain, but downpour after downpour and these hat "still" keep their shape. Other modern hats just don't seem to. Although I figure I must be asking too much, would this require a denser more compact felt?

Too much shellac would damage the felt no?. ( many years ago I used starch - but this appears to damage and shrink beyond compare )

( I have had many-many sleepless nights devoted the nature of fur felt - strange to some it may appear I'm sure)

My apologies for prattling on.

Gumbo.
 

gpsoldhat

New in Town
Messages
29
Location
missouri
I have a question about a Stetson firenza I got off eBay. It seems to be what I would call nappy or fuzzy. I was brushing it and a small amount came off on the brush. Is this normal? Thanks
 

gpsoldhat

New in Town
Messages
29
Location
missouri
A small black bristle brush. It's fairly soft. Bit I was brushing it the opposite of what you said. Maybe that's part of the problem. It was supposed to have only Been worn a couple of times and was in the original box with the plastic protector but looked dusty. Thanks for the help. I probably should have researched this on hat care thread before doing it. Jim b
 

Neophyte

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,445
Location
Chattanooga, TN
I posted this question in the "Western, Anyone?" thread as well, but I figure I'd post it here:

Is there a notable difference in the stiffness and durability of a western hat made of different grades of fur? Considering the stiffness of a proper western hat, would it make much of a difference in the long term if one was made of all rabbit or all beaver?

It would seem to me that unless you want a soft western, the quality level of the fur wouldn't factor in that much when looking at hats. Where dress hats are concerned, beaver fur in general is considered to provide a nicer quality of felt, which is desirable for a dress hat. Do those same preconceptions carry over to the western style?
 

JJR512

New in Town
Messages
11
Location
MD, USA
I posted this question in the "Western, Anyone?" thread as well, but I figure I'd post it here:

Is there a notable difference in the stiffness and durability of a western hat made of different grades of fur? Considering the stiffness of a proper western hat, would it make much of a difference in the long term if one was made of all rabbit or all beaver?

It would seem to me that unless you want a soft western, the quality level of the fur wouldn't factor in that much when looking at hats. Where dress hats are concerned, beaver fur in general is considered to provide a nicer quality of felt, which is desirable for a dress hat. Do those same preconceptions carry over to the western style?

Consider this...
For an all weather hat - you can't beat a pure beaver cowboy hat. Light, stiff, and fabulous looking it'll shed what ever comes it's way. And consider this: Beavers live in the water, rabbits in the dirt. 'Nuff said.
http://www.thelastbestwest.com/popups/cowboy_hat_facts.html#FurFelt
 

Neophyte

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,445
Location
Chattanooga, TN

Thanks for the reference :). However, after being exposed to the massive quantities of information available here on the Lounge, that kind of "here's a general comparison, now trust me on the details" pitch just doesn't cut it for me. This is no dig on the company, (product looks amazing), but a general comparison of animal habitats, without any additional supporting info or information about the different qualities of felt, isn't enough information for the informed customer.lol

I'm wondering if a pure beaver cowboy hat would keep it's shape, stiffness, and texture drastically longer than a pure rabbit cowboy hat. The price difference is pretty extreme, and as I have a very utilitarian perspective when it comes to long-term purchases, I'd like to know that there's a sizable payout difference to justify the large price gap, other than just the luxury of a pure beaver hat.

This is my mindset right now: beaver is harder to obtain, but [in general] provides a denser, more malleable felt that is slightly more water-resistant, in addition to being very soft.

Being that a western hat is usually stiff, the only advantage listed above that would be useful is the improved water-resistance. Are there factors I am not considering?

NEVERMIND: Question answered in another thread.
 
Last edited:

rlk

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,100
Location
Evanston, IL
I am curious about the vintage of the range of vintage hats acquired from E Bay, second-hand stores, attics, and so on as seen on TFL. The decade of origin is the best way to address it, in my view. I wonder if the survey-adept folks on TFL might get one going about people's estimates of the distribution of decades of old hats seen to be bought on TFL? This is my own opinion, based on what I've seen.

Before 1920: less than 1% (neglible) [1]
1920-30: 5% [3]
1930-40: 15% [8]
1940-50: 30% [30]
1950-60: 30% [43]
1960-70: 20% [15]

I realize that E Bay has many more recent-vintage hats, but they are not being shown here, and so I have no interest. Is this an interesting survey?

Numbers in brackets my guestimation. Far fewer 30's hats and far more 50's hats than people want to believe they find. Fewer survivors available as you go back. Low 60's for relative lack of interest in shorter brims and crowns here.
 
Last edited:

jimmy the lid

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,647
Location
USA
I am curious about the vintage of the range of vintage hats acquired from E Bay, second-hand stores, attics, and so on as seen on TFL. The decade of origin is the best way to address it, in my view. I wonder if the survey-adept folks on TFL might get one going about people's estimates of the distribution of decades of old hats seen to be bought on TFL? This is my own opinion, based on what I've seen.

Before 1920: less than 1% (neglible)
1920-30: 5% [3]
1930-40: 15% [8]
1940-50: 30% [30]
1950-60: 30% [43]
1960-70: 20% [15]

I realize that E Bay has many more recent-vintage hats, but they are not being shown here, and so I have no interest. Is this an interesting survey?

I do think that it's an interesting survey. In general, I tend to agree with rlk's assessment (shown in brackets) that there are fewer lids in the 1920 to 1940 range. I do agree with you, Dan, that 20% is probably close on the 1960's hats.

I think most people overestimate the number of lids that are actually from the 40's -- particularly early/mid 40's (in many cases, this may be a function of general, uninformed, information tossed out there by an eBay seller). Seems to me that most 40's lids that actually show up here are post-war/late 40's. I might put 40's lids in the 20 to 25% range. I agree that the bulk of the vintage lids that make their way to the Lounge are from the 50's.

Interesting...

Cheers,
JtL
 

rlk

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,100
Location
Evanston, IL
I do think that it's an interesting survey. In general, I tend to agree with rlk's assessment (shown in brackets) that there are fewer lids in the 1920 to 1940 range. I do agree with you, Dan, that 20% is probably close on the 1960's hats.

I think most people overestimate the number of lids that are actually from the 40's -- particularly early/mid 40's (in many cases, this may be a function of general, uninformed, information tossed out there by an eBay seller). Seems to me that most 40's lids that actually show up here are post-war/late 40's. I might put 40's lids in the 20 to 25% range. I agree that the bulk of the vintage lids that make their way to the Lounge are from the 50's.

Interesting...

Cheers,
JtL

Absolutely, I would put the 1945-55 range at the peak, probably around 60% of what we see here. A lot of OR's and Borsalino are likely 60's and 70's.
 
Last edited:

T Rick

Practically Family
Messages
934
Location
Metro Detroit
how and what do they do, in order to get that look details pleas ?
thank you
Andreas
Are you talking about Jackets? :eusa_doh: I think you've accidentally posted in the wrong area. They do make some great looking jackets though!

Oh, and Welcome to The Lounge, and Merry Christmas!
 

Neophyte

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,445
Location
Chattanooga, TN
Anyone own a new Stetson Nostalgia? I'm looking at them online, but I would welcome anyones advice on the matter.

Talk to B.J. Hedberg, he's got a new one I believe. So does Mr. E Train, but he's on less frequently than Hedberg. Good luck, and Merry Christmas!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,284
Messages
3,033,039
Members
52,748
Latest member
R_P_Meldner
Top